arXiv:2609. 18901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In physics-informed machine learning, a target function $u^*$ is learned from noisy value observations $y_i=u^*(x_i)+ \varepsilon_i$, together with differential information, given either by noisy observations $d_j=(Du^*)(z_j)+\xi_j$ or by a known physical constraint $Du^*=v$.
By Luc Brogat-Motte, Joachim Bona-Pellissier, Giacomo Meanti, Lorenzo Rosasco
arXiv:2608. 14619v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work proposes a new interpretable neural operator framework, termed the Physics Informed Kernel Function Neural Operator (PIKFNO), which explicitly incorporates physics informed kernel functions derived from governing equations into the neural operator architecture.
By Yuan Guo, Hanshu Chen, Zhuojia Fu
arXiv:2609. 16406v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning-based partial differential equations (PDEs) solvers have attracted significant attention in recent years.
By Chi-An Chen, Chunyang Liao, Ming Zhong
arXiv:2607. 25608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding governing physical laws into deep neural networks.
By Pinki Khatun, M. Sajid, Abhinav Jha, M. Tanveer
arXiv:2608. 11831v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning mappings between infinite-dimensional objects is a central challenge in scientific machine learning.
By Adrien Weihs, Chunyang Liao, Jingmin Sun, Hayden Schaeffer
arXiv:2606. 06171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks inherently suffer from task interference because they rely on a shared parameter space to satisfy both governing differential equations and boundary conditions.
By Cornelius Otchere, Michael Shields
arXiv:2601. 21284v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models have emerged as powerful generative tools for modeling complex data distributions, yet their purely data-driven nature limits applicability in engineering and scientific problems where physical laws must be respected.
By Tianyi Zeng, Tianyi Wang, Jiaru Zhang, Zimo Zeng, Feiyang Zhang, Yiming Xu, Sikai Chen, Junfeng Jiao, Christian Claudel, Xinbo Chen
arXiv:2607. 11094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have shown promise for solving partial differential equations (PDEs); however, their synchronous optimization treats residuals of different regions and constraints equally, which is inconsistent with the progressive "from source to response" physical information propagation path, degrading training stability and accuracy.
By Zhangyi Lian, Xinda Dong, Wenxuan Huo, Weifeng Huang, Gang Zhu, Qiang He
We study kernel-based operator learning in a two-stage sampling framework, where an offline kernel regression operator learns a discretized representation of the target operator from input-output pairs and an online kernel reconstruction operator recovers the output function from predicted observations. Our main theoretical contribution is an explicit budget allocation condition relating the number $N$ of training pairs, the number $n$ of input observations, and the output resolution $m$.
arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.
By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
arXiv:2607. 06287v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study kernel-based operator learning in a two-stage sampling framework, where an offline kernel regression operator learns a discretized representation of the target operator from input-output pairs and an online kernel reconstruction operator recovers the output function from predicted observations.
By R\"udiger Kempf
The paper presents a theoretical framework for certifying the accuracy of physics‑informed neural networks (PINNs) used to solve partial differential equations. It derives generalization bounds that link the residual loss minimized during training to the actual error in the solution space, showing that if the neural approximation stays within a compact subset, a vanishing residual guarantees convergence to the true solution. Deterministic and probabilistic convergence results are provided, offering explicit error guarantees based on residual, boundary, and initial condition errors.
By Amartya Mukherjee, Maxwell Fitzsimmons, David C. Del Rey Fern\'andez, Jun Liu