The paper presents a theoretical framework for certifying the accuracy of physics‑informed neural networks (PINNs) used to solve partial differential equations. It derives generalization bounds that link the residual loss minimized during training to the actual error in the solution space, showing that if the neural approximation stays within a compact subset, a vanishing residual guarantees convergence to the true solution. Deterministic and probabilistic convergence results are provided, offering explicit error guarantees based on residual, boundary, and initial condition errors.
arXiv:2609.07437v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a growing frontier in using artificial intelligence to solve partial differential equations (PDEs)...
The article discusses how automatic differentiation (AD) enables neural networks to compute derivatives of governing equations to machine precision, forming the backbone of physics-informed machine learning. However, the author argues that numerical exactness does not guarantee physical fidelity, as AD lacks awareness of the physical structure a solution must satisfy. The paper highlights that many physical constraints—such as convection directionality, diffusion, dispersion, conservation, thermodynamic consistency, symmetry, symplectic structure, positivity, monotonicity, and boundedness—are overlooked by AD, suggesting a need to rethink how PDE-driven neural surrogates are built.
Physics-Informed Error Field Learning (PIEFL) is a post‑training optimization framework for Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). After a primary network reaches satisfactory accuracy, PIEFL introduces an auxiliary error network that learns the discrepancy between the current approximation and the exact solution by deriving error control equations under physical constraints. The learned error correction is then combined with the primary prediction, improving solution accuracy without modifying the primary network architecture and focusing computational resources on correcting existing prediction errors.
arXiv:2606. 19754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) play a central role in modeling complex physical, biological, and engineering systems.
arXiv:2607. 24726v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Deep Galerkin Method (DGM) and Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have become widely-used methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) in the rapidly growing field of scientific machine learning.
arXiv:2609.24947v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators evaluate parametric partial differential equations cheaply but degrade sharply outside their training distribution. Physics-informed n...
arXiv:2609. 16406v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning-based partial differential equations (PDEs) solvers have attracted significant attention in recent years.
arXiv:2607. 02194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising route to solve partial differential equations, yet they have struggled to reach the precision of classical solvers.
arXiv:2602.01176v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding physica...
The paper introduces StablePDENet, a physics-informed adversarial training framework that regularizes the residual sensitivity of neural operators to improve stability against input perturbations. The method formulates operator learning as a min–max optimization, where a physics-based projected‑gradient adversary generates perturbations and the outer objective combines the attacked physics loss with a normalized residual‑sensitivity penalty. Experiments on benchmark problems show that StablePDENet outperforms PI‑DeepONet and its adversarial variant in accuracy under adversarial attacks while maintaining competitive performance on clean data, and it also enhances generalization and highlights the distinction between model sensitivity and intrinsic operator ill‑conditioning.
arXiv:2609.36216v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators are typically trained in a supervised fashion, which requires a dataset to be generated with a classical solver. Training them physics...
The paper explores neural network solvers for infinity and p‑Laplace problems, employing Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets). It addresses computational challenges for large p values (2 to 1000) across 2D and 3D domains, showing advantages over traditional mesh‑based solvers, especially in three dimensions. The authors provide conditional convergence results for PINNs, a universal approximation theorem for DeepONet on the parametric p‑Poisson problem, and validate their methods with numerical experiments comparing performance to conventional approaches.