arXiv:2606. 31763v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous wet-lab experimentation requires more than plausible protocol text: biological intent, quantitative procedures, device constraints and experimental feedback must remain aligned from protocol and SOP design to code and physical execution.
By Yankai Jiang, Weiting Tang, Haoran Sun, Zhenyu Tang, Yuejie Hou, Yingnan Han, Rubo Wang, Yueyuxiao Yang, Cheng Liang, Lilong Wang, Wenjie Lou, Xiaosong Wang, Lei Bai, Meng Yang
BEAKER is a new benchmark for evaluating embodied actionability, knowledge, experimentation, and reasoning in self‑driving chemical laboratories. It contains 1,000 expert‑curated question‑answer pairs across 11 image and video task types, covering affordance grounding, trajectory planning, equipment and state recognition, safety, apparatus setup, operation, step reasoning, and temporal procedure reasoning. The benchmark is manually created and reviewed by chemistry and embodied AI experts, and it tests 28 different multimodal large language models in an offline, single‑turn setting.
By Fei Lin, Tengchao Zhang, Ziyang Gong, Xiaotong Yu, Bohan Zhang, Yifan Zhou, Qihao Yang, Ji Dai, Dong Li, Yining Jiang, Qinghua Ni, Jun Huang, Qiang Zhang, Yue Zhou, Zhihang Zhong, Yonglin Tian, Fei-Yue Wang, Xue Yang
arXiv:2601. 21570v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The field of Embodied AI is witnessing a rapid evolution toward general-purpose robotic systems, fueled by high-fidelity simulation and large-scale data collection.
By Zixing Lei, Genjia Liu, Yuanshuo Zhang, Qipeng Liu, Yuzhu Cai, Sixiang Chen, Jixian Wu, Yunhong Wang, Weixin Li, Chuan Wen, Bo Zhao, Shanghang Zhang, Wenzhao Lian, Siheng Chen
arXiv:2605. 07306v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Biological laboratory automation can reduce repetitive manual work and improve reproducibility, but reliable embodied execution in wet-lab environments remains challenging.
By Zhaohui Du, Zhe Wang, Hongmei Fei, Xiwen Cao, Ting Xiao, Qi Wang, Huanbo Jin, Jiaming Gu, Quan Lu, Zhe Liu
arXiv:2610.18933v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Modern coding agents are fundamentally reshaping the role of human input for computational research: they write code, launch in silico experiments, a...
By Robert Tjarko Lange, Luca Grillotti, Yutaro Yamada, Rujikorn Charakorn, David Ha
arXiv:2607.03863v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Artificial intelligence has advanced scientific discovery, but most AI4Science systems remain fragmented tools that rely on humans to coordinate pr...
By Yining Zheng, Yuxin Wang, Jiahao Lu, Shicheng Fang, Weiyi Wang, Yongzhuo Yang, Bowen Li, Haochen Ma, Chen Hu, Bowen Chen, Yang Wang, Huanhui Chen, Yitong Chen, Jiajun Chen, Zhiyuan Li, Yanlin Li, Zhuo Yang, Qifeng Wu, Jiaying He, Zhijie Jinluo, Xiaohu Xu, Yi Feng, Juncheng Qian, Yizhou Chen, Yang Cheng, Tong Zhu, Tianlei Ying, Hongyu Yu, Hongjun Xiang, Xipeng Qiu
arXiv:2606. 26722v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The automation of scientific discovery has reached an inflection point.
By Xianrui Zeng, Pengfei Liu, Yirui Zang, Yang Shen, Fei Yu, Chunlei Yu, Minghao Liu, Yang Du
LabFactory is a framework that transforms a scientific brief into an executable AI lab, integrating models, knowledge resources, tools, and a controller behind a fixed interface. The builder packages the lab in a metered workspace, and a separate host evaluates the delivered artifact on held‑out inputs, ensuring the system itself is the evaluation target. Across 28 constructions in seven scientific domains, the delivered labs surpassed reference values on all 33 subtests, demonstrating that an AI agent can fully realize a scientific brief into a working, inspectable lab.
By Jinge Wu, Hongjian Zhou, Mingde Zeng, Jiayuan Zhu, Junde Wu, Jiazhen Pan, Lei Clifton, Andrew Liu, David A. Clifton
arXiv:2606. 20120v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Biological experiment protocols are written in natural language, whereas automation systems rely on predefined control commands, creating a semantic gap that limits autonomous execution.
By Hyeonna Choi, Jung Yup Kim, Hyuneui Lim, Seunggyu Jeon
OSWorld-Science is a benchmark and evaluation environment for computer-using agents that use visual language models (VLMs) to perform scientific software tasks. It includes 12 VLMs and 146 high-quality tasks across domains such as molecular drawing, pathology image analysis, statistical computing, and physical simulation, with artifact-based evaluation and a harness that logs interactions and supports model comparison. The benchmark was developed through expert proposals and iterative human–AI co‑design, and results show that current VLMs still struggle with key scientific questions, offering insights into factors like language, reasoning, and context length.
By Dingyuan Dai, Heli Qi, Lei Liu, Yinxi Li, Baiding Chen, Zijun Dou, Qingcheng Zeng, Qi Kang, Oliver Sun, Eric Wang, Bo Zhou, Haixin Wang, Yufan Du, Shi Bo, Ruihan Lin, Mengqi Yuan, Dunjie Lu, Steven Dillmann, Yiming Shi, Tina Su, Amy Xin, Minghao Liu, Xi Wang, Xu Huang, Ge Zhang, Pengyu Nie, Zhen Yang, Jie Tang, Juanzi Li, Weihao Xuan, Tianyu Liu
La Agente ’Optima is an agentic framework that builds and manages Bayesian optimization campaigns for self‑driving laboratories, separating large language model reasoning from campaign execution. It maintains a persistent optimization state, allowing consistent repetitive loops and auditable decisions, and only returns control to the agent when interpretation or revision is needed. In tests on digital discovery tasks and physical platforms, it corrected measurement failures, improved yields, and recommended formulation changes, outperforming human‑directed campaigns in cost and material usage.
By Marcel M\"uller, Jiaru Bai, Willi Gottstein, Abhijoy Mandal, Mohammad Nazeri, Elia Savino, Yanlin Fang, Sujoy Das, Sergio Pablo Garc\'ia Carrillo, Yeonghun Kang, Juan B. P\'erez-S\'anchez, Simone Pilon, Martin Fitzner, Timothy No\"el, Frank Gu, Varinia Bernales, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik
arXiv:2606. 12736v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents are increasingly being developed to accelerate scientific discovery, yet their practical capabilities in real research settings remain poorly understood.
By Tianyu Liu, Allen Xin Wang, Antonia Panescu, Lisa Xinyi Chen, Wenxin Long, Xinyu Wei, Yueqian Jing, Ziyao Zeng, Jihang Chen, Sihan Jiang, Ziqing Wang, Siyi Gu, Siyu Chen, Xinyang Hu, Haoran Shao, Leqi Xu, Wangjie Zheng, Zhiyuan Cao, Ada Fang, Botao Yu, Kunyang Sun, Rex Ying, Arman Cohan, Qingyu Chen, Lingzhou Xue, Kaize Ding, Yuanqi Du, Wengong Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Marinka Zitnik, James Zou, Hua Xu, Hongyu Zhao