arXiv AI

TAVR-VLM: Risk-Conditioned Causal Grounding for Hallucination-Resistant Report Generation

arXiv:2606. 26874v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) planning requires meticulous multimodal reasoning.

arXiv AI
Aug 12

CARE: Confidence-Aware Reasoning for Reliable Medical VQA

arXiv:2608. 10964v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) has enabled medical Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to produce Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning for visual question answering, yet these models suffer from $\textit{confidence miscalibration}$---a systematic gap between expressed certainty and actual diagnostic accuracy that undermines clinical trust.

By Yuetian Du, Yucheng Wang, Zhenyuan Chen, Luyuan Chen, Rongyu Zhang, Jinjian Zhang, Wei Zhou, Zhijie Xu, Ming Kong, Zhan Zhou, Jie Liu, Qiang Zhu
arXiv AI
Jul 21

Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain

arXiv:2603. 21693v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for medical Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they remain prone to hallucinations, defined as generating responses that contradict the input image, posing serious risks in clinical settings.

By Mohammad Asadi, Tahoura Nedaee, Jack W. O'Sullivan, Euan Ashley, Ehsan Adeli
arXiv AI
Sep 7

When Seeing Overrides Knowing: Visual Dominance and Deferral-Based Method for Personalized Safety in VLMs

The paper introduces MPS-Bench, a benchmark of 5,181 scenarios from 584 real-world images across 12 high-risk domains, each paired with a hidden user profile, to evaluate personalized safety in vision‑language models (VLMs). Eight leading VLMs were tested and found to almost always respond directly (86‑99%) without seeking missing context, scoring no higher than 2.6/5 on personalized safety. The authors identify a phenomenon called visual dominance, where visual information enters text representations early and suppresses textual risk signals, and propose PRISM, a lightweight input monitor that predicts when a query should be deferred, achieving 0.978 AUC and outperforming all tested models on the safety‑utility Pareto frontier.

By Edward Sun, Yuchen Wu, Zixian Ma, Eric Hanchen Jiang, Yijia Xiao, Xiaoyuan Yi, Ranjay Krishna, Wei Wang, Jindong Wang, Aylin Caliskan
arXiv AI
Sep 24

NV-Reason-CT: 3D Visual Language Model for CT Analysis

NV-Reason-CT is a generative vision‑language model designed for chest and abdominal CT analysis that preserves native 3D visual encoding and incorporates radiologist‑guided reasoning. The system couples a 3D vision transformer with a language model, feeding all visual tokens and their 3D coordinates directly into language decoding to maintain volumetric spatial information. Trained on a curated corpus of about 550,000 multimodal instruction examples, the model supports abnormality classification, report generation, and interactive reasoning, achieving strong performance on CT benchmarks and reducing expert interpretation time by 50%.

By Andriy Myronenko, Dong Yang, Yucheng Tang, Baris Turkbey, Benjamin Simon, Stephanie Harmon, Rikhil Makwana, Mariam Aboian, Sena Azamat, Ibrahim Ethem Hamamci, Sezgin Er, Bjoern Menze, Marc Edgar, Yufan He, Pengfei Guo, Daguang Xu
arXiv AI
Jul 1

Breaking Failure Cascades: Step-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Medical Multimodal Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 31825v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent multimodal large language models have shown great promise in clinical image reasoning, but existing post-training pipelines remain predominantly outcome-centric, relying on final answer correctness or sequence-level preferences.

By Junha Jung, Minbyul Jeong, Suhyeon Lim, Sungwook Jung, Jaehoon Yun, Taeyun Roh, Mujeen Sung, Jaewoo Kang
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVLMs via Attention Imbalance Rectification

arXiv:2603. 24058v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Object hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) severely compromises their reliability in real-world applications, posing a critical barrier to their deployment in high-stakes scenarios such as autonomous driving and medical image analysis.

By Han Sun, Qin Li, Peixin Wang, Min Zhang
arXiv AI
Jun 30

IMCBench: A benchmark for multimodal LLMs in Image-grounded Medical Conversations

arXiv:2606. 28556v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in large language models and vision-language models have enabled reasoning over multimodal data, offering opportunities for clinical applications such as decision support and triaging.

By Maria Xenochristou, Ashutosh Joshi, Korosh Vatanparvar, Mohammad Abuzar Hashemi, Prasad Kasu, Deepak Bansal, Anchal Nema, Nivedita Wadhwa, Prashams S Jain, Rebecca Abraham, Will Kimbrough, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Wilko Schulz-Mahlendorf
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

UR$^{2}$-MLLM: Uncertainty-aware Revisit Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models for Radiology Report Generation

The paper introduces UR$^{2}$-MLLM, an uncertainty‑aware multimodal large language model that dynamically revisits uncertain image regions during radiology report generation. It incorporates an uncertainty perception module trained on a specialized dataset, builds a multimodal reasoning trajectory with a detect‑and‑copy mechanism to guide revisits, and refines this behavior using a visual grounding reward via reinforcement learning. Experiments on MIMIC‑CXR and IU‑Xray demonstrate state‑of‑the‑art performance, underscoring the importance of visual revisit reasoning for reliable, clinically aligned reports.

By Yucheng Chen, Yang Yu, Jiazhou Zhou, Yufei Shi, Yongying Lan, Yichi Zhang, Liyi Li, Si Yong Yeo
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Hallucination in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey on Causes, Corrections, and Evaluations

The article surveys hallucination issues in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs), a type of multimodal foundation model that blends visual data with large language models. It categorizes hallucination causes into model architecture and data quality, presents a taxonomy of mitigation strategies, and critically evaluates existing evaluation benchmarks from both discriminative and generative viewpoints. The survey also outlines open challenges and future research directions to improve LVLM reliability and trustworthiness.

By Yinghao Guo, Wei Lan, Wenyi Chen, Qingfeng Chen, Shichao Zhang, Shirui Pan, Huiyu Zhou, Yi Pan