As vision language models are increasingly deployed in clinical diagnosis, understanding how they internally resolve competing visual and textual signals becomes a safety imperative. Existing mechanis...
arXiv:2607. 03358v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how visual information is routed in vision-language models (VLMs).
By Israfel Salazar, Stella Frank, Dan Oneata, Desmond Elliott, Constanza Fierro
arXiv:2608.30750v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) can comply with harmful requests delivered through images, even when their LLM backbones would refuse the same content in...
By Jiaxuan Li, Jiahao Zhang, Duc Minh Vo, Huy H. Nguyen, Pride Kavumba, Koki Wataoka
arXiv:2606. 26874v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) planning requires meticulous multimodal reasoning.
By Zhixiang Lu, Xiwei Liu, Sifan Song, Changkai Ji, Anh Nguyen, Jionglong Su, Imran Razzak, Jinfeng Wang
FLIP is a final‑layer inference‑time probe designed to test whether a logit‑facing intervention site in an open‑weight vision‑language model (VLM) supports structured, task‑linked computation rather than generic perturbation. The probe applies elementwise flooring to the final normalized hidden state before logit computation, leaving other model components unchanged. By sweeping intervention strength on a controlled detection/counting task, FLIP identifies three regimes—negligible change, a bounded interior regime with improved detection recall and reduced counting error, and over‑suppression—while a four‑criterion protocol ensures the observed effects are mechanistically interpretable.
By Drandreb Earl O. Juanico, Rowel O. Atienza
arXiv:2606. 17389v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal Foundation Models are increasingly used as reasoning agents, making reliability, knowing when a model may hallucinate, critical.
By Logan Mann, Yi Xia, Ajit Saravanan, Ishan Dave, Saadullah Ismail, Shikhar Shiromani, Emily Huang, Ruizhe Li, Kevin Zhu
arXiv:2606. 27596v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) exhibit sophisticated reasoning but remain susceptible to object hallucination.
By Liu Yu, Can Chen, Ping Kuang, Zhikun Feng, Fan Zhou, Gillian Dobbie
arXiv:2603. 24058v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Object hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) severely compromises their reliability in real-world applications, posing a critical barrier to their deployment in high-stakes scenarios such as autonomous driving and medical image analysis.
By Han Sun, Qin Li, Peixin Wang, Min Zhang
arXiv:2509. 25533v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As Vision Language Models (VLMs) are deployed across safety-critical applications, understanding and controlling their behavioral patterns has become increasingly important.
By Ravikumar Balakrishnan, Mansi Phute
arXiv:2607. 24354v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic prompt optimization (APO) has been widely adopted to adapt vision-language models (VLMs) to downstream tasks without weight updates, yielding promising results.
By Haoyue Liu, Xiaoyu Ma, Ye Chen, Yuexian Zou, Xiaoying Tang
The paper investigates a failure mode in multimodal large language models called multimodal contextual sycophancy, where external text can override conflicting image evidence. A diagnostic set of 998 cases independently varies visual evidence, commonsense priors, and external text to probe when this failure occurs. Experiments across six models show that a System‑2 Visual Arbitration (S2VA) approach, which withholds text from the visual witness, significantly improves performance over direct witness reports, with the best information boundary varying by model and context source.
By Yi-Cheng Lai, Hen-Hsen Huang
arXiv:2608. 04510v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion-based vision-language-action (VLA) policies can generate plausible actions even when their predictions are weakly grounded in the visual and language evidence defining the task.
By Suhas Hegde, Jitendra Yasaswi Bharadwaj Katta