arXiv AI
CRAFT: Causal Responsibility and Failure Tracing in Medical Vision Language Models
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
4d ago
CRAFT: Causal Responsibility and Failure Tracing in Medical Vision Language Models
As vision language models are increasingly deployed in clinical diagnosis, understanding how they internally resolve competing visual and textual signals becomes a safety imperative. Existing mechanis...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 7
Pathways of Visual Information Flow in Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2607. 03358v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how visual information is routed in vision-language models (VLMs).
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1
Do VLMs Share Safety Neurons Across Modalities?
arXiv:2608.30750v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) can comply with harmful requests delivered through images, even when their LLM backbones would refuse the same content in...
arXiv AI
Jun 26
TAVR-VLM: Risk-Conditioned Causal Grounding for Hallucination-Resistant Report Generation
arXiv:2606. 26874v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) planning requires meticulous multimodal reasoning.
arXiv AI
6d ago
FLIP: Final Layer Inference-Time Probing for Vision-Language Models
FLIP is a final‑layer inference‑time probe designed to test whether a logit‑facing intervention site in an open‑weight vision‑language model (VLM) supports structured, task‑linked computation rather than generic perturbation. The probe applies elementwise flooring to the final normalized hidden state before logit computation, leaving other model components unchanged. By sweeping intervention strength on a controlled detection/counting task, FLIP identifies three regimes—negligible change, a bounded interior regime with improved detection recall and reduced counting error, and over‑suppression—while a four‑criterion protocol ensures the observed effects are mechanistically interpretable.
arXiv AI
Jun 17
Visuals Lie, Consistency Speaks: Disentangling Spatial Attention from Reliability in Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2606. 17389v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal Foundation Models are increasingly used as reasoning agents, making reliability, knowing when a model may hallucinate, critical.