arXiv AI

Controlled Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Fault Classification and Localization in Power System Protection

arXiv:2510. 00831v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The increasing complexity of modern power systems, driven by the integration of inverter-based and distributed energy resources, challenges the reliability of conventional protection schemes and motivates the use of machine learning for protection tasks.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 16

A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Fault Detection and Line Identification in Electrical Power Grids

arXiv:2609.16744v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The integration of renewable energy sources into the electrical grid introduces complex challenges in fault detection and coordination of grid recovery...

By Julian Oelhaf, Georg Kordowich, Paula Andrea P\'erez-Toro, Tom\'as Arias-Vergara, Andreas Maier, Johann J\"ager, Siming Bayer
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

EvEMTBench: An Open Benchmark for Machine Learning in Power System Protection

EvEMTBench is an open, executable, and versioned benchmark designed to standardize the evaluation of machine‑learning methods for power system protection. It defines 12 protection and event‑analysis functions across four grids (20–345 kV) as 24 scored tasks, enabling structured assessment under varied observability, distribution shifts, and cross‑grid transfer scenarios. The benchmark includes committed data partitions, leakage controls, and reproducible reporting, and demonstrates that wider observability does not always help, that shifted conditions expose hidden failures, and that fault detection transfers better than fault localization.

By Julian Oelhaf, Georg Kordowich, Christian Bergler, Andreas Maier, Johann J\"ager, Siming Bayer
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 26

A Hybrid Two-Stage Machine Learning Pipeline for Fault Detection and Classification in Power Transmission Systems

The paper introduces a hybrid two‑stage machine learning pipeline for fault detection and classification in high‑voltage transmission networks. Stage 1 uses an Isolation Forest anomaly detector combined with an optional supervised binary detector, while Stage 2 applies a Random Forest multiclass classifier only to samples flagged by Stage 1. Feature engineering maps six raw channels to eighteen features, including zero‑sequence symmetrical components, achieving end‑to‑end accuracies of 95.8 % on the TLFaultDataset and 97.25 % on an independent single‑point dataset, surpassing federated benchmarks without GPU or federated infrastructure.

By Sahil Manikshete, Atharva Gujarathi, Thanh Long Vu, Akhtar Hussain, Van-Hai Bui
arXiv AI
Sep 7

Data-Optimized Contingency Screening: A Machine Learning Approach to Power System Security

The paper presents a machine‑learning framework for classifying power‑system contingencies into safe, moderate, or severe categories. Using Newton‑Raphson load flow data, the study applies SMOTE, PCA, and classifiers (KNN, Random Forest, SVM) to IEEE‑14 and IEEE‑30 bus systems, evaluating performance with precision, recall, and F1 score. Random Forest achieved the highest F1 scores, while PCA improved overall performance more than SMOTE, which boosted recall at the cost of some false positives.

By Joshua Salako, Folajimi Osikomaiya, Olakorede Olamiju
arXiv AI
Aug 18

Graph Machine Learning: An Opportunity for Power Systems

arXiv:2608. 16494v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern power systems face growing operational complexity driven by the integration of renewable energy sources, decentralization, and the need for real-time decision-making across a wide range of timescales.

By Martin Sadric, Sebastian P\"utz, Christian Nauck, Veit Hagenmeyer, Frank Hellmann, Dirk Witthaut, Benjamin Sch\"afer
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Tools to Explain Neural Networks for Power System Dynamics

arXiv:2608. 08048v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper presents, for the first time in power systems literature to our knowledge, analytical tools to explain the training performance of machine learning surrogate models for power system dynamics.

By Petros Ellinas, Johanna Vorwerk, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 24

PROTECT-90: A Fault Dataset for Power System Protection

arXiv:2606. 24298v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The increasing interest in data-driven methods for power system protection is accompanied by a lack of standardized, publicly available high-voltage waveform datasets that enable transparent and reproducible evaluation.

By Julian Oelhaf, Georg Kordowich, Christian Bergler, Andreas Maier, Johann J\"ager, Siming Bayer
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 23

Climate-resilient electric vehicle charging infrastructure for sustainable cities: An interpretable causal-ensemble framework for preventive maintenance and low-carbon mobility

Reliable electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure is a cornerstone of sustainable, low-carbon cities, yet urban climate stress such as extreme heat, heavy precipitation, and humidity increasingly raises equipment fault risk and undermines the resilience of urban energy and mobility services. Shifting operation from reactive repair to preventive maintenance depends on accurate, forward-looking fault-risk prediction, a task complicated by the heterogeneous time scales of physical, behavioral, contextual, and historical signals and by forecasting over a multi-week horizon.