arXiv:2510. 00831v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The increasing complexity of modern power systems, driven by the integration of inverter-based and distributed energy resources, challenges the reliability of conventional protection schemes and motivates the use of machine learning for protection tasks.
By Julian Oelhaf, Georg Kordowich, Changhun Kim, Paula Andrea P\'erez-Toro, Christian Bergler, Andreas Maier, Johann J\"ager, Siming Bayer
arXiv:2308. 07867v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The absence of formal performance guarantees in machine learning (ML) has limited its adoption for safety-critical power system applications, where confidence and interpretability are as vital as accuracy.
By Parikshit Pareek, Sidhant Misra, Deepjyoti Deka
arXiv:2607. 16031v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data-driven pre-fault dynamic security assessment (DSA) rapidly evaluates the dynamic risk of credible contingencies on a power system using machine learning.
By Olayiwola Arowolo, Maosheng Yang, Jochen Cremer
arXiv:2607. 27681v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transient-stability assessment determines whether a power system can recover after a disturbance and is therefore essential to preventing generator trips and cascading outages.
By Baoli Hao, Chenxi Hu, Ming Zhong, Ren Wang
arXiv:2606. 15856v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Operational disturbance monitoring in power networks requires decisions to be made from waveform windows as they arrive, rather than from completed records after the event.
By Eduardo Jr Piedad, Eduardo Prieto-Araujo, Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt
arXiv:2607. 13221v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-time N-1 contingency screening in an energy management system trades assurance against cost: verifying every credible outage with full power flow is too slow, while fast linear-sensitivity screening gives no statistical guarantee and can silently pass unsafe operating points, especially when a controller drives the system into unfamiliar regimes.
By Jayakumar Manoharan