EvEMTBench is an open, executable, and versioned benchmark designed to standardize the evaluation of machine‑learning methods for power system protection. It defines 12 protection and event‑analysis functions across four grids (20–345 kV) as 24 scored tasks, enabling structured assessment under varied observability, distribution shifts, and cross‑grid transfer scenarios. The benchmark includes committed data partitions, leakage controls, and reproducible reporting, and demonstrates that wider observability does not always help, that shifted conditions expose hidden failures, and that fault detection transfers better than fault localization.
By Julian Oelhaf, Georg Kordowich, Christian Bergler, Andreas Maier, Johann J\"ager, Siming Bayer
arXiv:2609.16744v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The integration of renewable energy sources into the electrical grid introduces complex challenges in fault detection and coordination of grid recovery...
By Julian Oelhaf, Georg Kordowich, Paula Andrea P\'erez-Toro, Tom\'as Arias-Vergara, Andreas Maier, Johann J\"ager, Siming Bayer
arXiv:2608. 20181v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Studies of machine-learning-based power-system protection increasingly report near-perfect scores, yet the meaning of those scores depends strongly on the evaluation setting.
By Julian Oelhaf, Georg Kordowich, Paula Andrea P\'erez-Toro, Christian Bergler, Johann J\"ager, Andreas Maier, Siming Bayer
arXiv:2510. 00831v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The increasing complexity of modern power systems, driven by the integration of inverter-based and distributed energy resources, challenges the reliability of conventional protection schemes and motivates the use of machine learning for protection tasks.
By Julian Oelhaf, Georg Kordowich, Changhun Kim, Paula Andrea P\'erez-Toro, Christian Bergler, Andreas Maier, Johann J\"ager, Siming Bayer
The paper introduces a hybrid two‑stage machine learning pipeline for fault detection and classification in high‑voltage transmission networks. Stage 1 uses an Isolation Forest anomaly detector combined with an optional supervised binary detector, while Stage 2 applies a Random Forest multiclass classifier only to samples flagged by Stage 1. Feature engineering maps six raw channels to eighteen features, including zero‑sequence symmetrical components, achieving end‑to‑end accuracies of 95.8 % on the TLFaultDataset and 97.25 % on an independent single‑point dataset, surpassing federated benchmarks without GPU or federated infrastructure.
By Sahil Manikshete, Atharva Gujarathi, Thanh Long Vu, Akhtar Hussain, Van-Hai Bui
arXiv:2607. 16031v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data-driven pre-fault dynamic security assessment (DSA) rapidly evaluates the dynamic risk of credible contingencies on a power system using machine learning.
By Olayiwola Arowolo, Maosheng Yang, Jochen Cremer
arXiv:2607. 08918v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cyber-physical power systems are vulnerable to cascading failures caused by tight interdependencies between power and communication infrastructures.
By Sohini Roy, Xheni Hylviu
The paper investigates using offline reinforcement learning to improve line‑selective tripping in distribution grids. A convolutional Q‑network trained with conservative Q‑learning (CQL) processes voltage‑current phasor and impedance data, optionally with raw waveforms, to predict faulted lines. On a realistic CIGRE medium‑voltage network, the best model achieved high per‑timestep precision, recall, and F1‑score, and correctly identified the first trip action in over 98% of fault episodes, though it mis‑tripped in a notable fraction of non‑fault cases.
By Julian Oelhaf, Alexander Luce, Christian Bergler, Andreas Maier, Siming Bayer
The paper presents a machine‑learning framework for classifying power‑system contingencies into safe, moderate, or severe categories. Using Newton‑Raphson load flow data, the study applies SMOTE, PCA, and classifiers (KNN, Random Forest, SVM) to IEEE‑14 and IEEE‑30 bus systems, evaluating performance with precision, recall, and F1 score. Random Forest achieved the highest F1 scores, while PCA improved overall performance more than SMOTE, which boosted recall at the cost of some false positives.
By Joshua Salako, Folajimi Osikomaiya, Olakorede Olamiju
The study compares XGBoost and RoBERTa‑LoRA for network intrusion detection across three evaluation axes: same‑dataset performance, cross‑dataset transfer, and adversarial evasion. Both models perform similarly on the same dataset, but XGBoost outperforms RoBERTa‑LoRA by 15 F1 points and 25 balanced accuracy points when transferred to a different network, while RoBERTa‑LoRA wins by about 17 F1 points under adversarial evasion. Feature‑leakage ablation shows that cross‑dataset transfer improvements are non‑monotonic and directional, suggesting leakage is spread across features rather than isolated.
"whyItMatters":"The findings demonstrate that a model’s superiority depends on the specific robustness axis evaluated, underscoring the need for multi‑axis, multi‑metric testing in network intrusion detection research."
By Muhammad Ebad Atif, Muhammad Haider Ali
The paper investigates how to properly validate candidate models before promoting them to replace incumbent classifiers in adaptive network intrusion detection systems. It demonstrates that promotion decisions can be biased by how challengers are constructed and the amount of evidence they receive, and that using self‑contained challenger pipelines and sufficient candidate evidence reduces apparent promotion harm. The study also shows that policy rankings shift with candidate comparability and that no single update policy dominates across benchmarks.
By Roberto Fern\'andez-Barrios, Iker Pastor-L\'opez, Amaia Pikatza-Huerga, Pablo Garc\'ia Bringas
arXiv:2608.30323v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Normal behavior models have shown promise for reliable fault detection in wind turbines. However, these unsupervised anomaly detection models require s...
By Stefan Jonas, Angela Meyer