Understanding driver emotion and state is critical for the next generation of intelligent in-cabin systems that ensure safety and enhance human-vehicle interaction. However, existing public datasets for in-cabin affective computing are largely limited to visual modalities and rarely include conversational information, making it difficult to capture the linguistic and interactive cues underlying driver emotion.
arXiv:2608. 06378v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Driver emotions can affect risk perception, decision-making, and vehicle control under complex road conditions.
By Chang Liu, Dalai Mengke, Hanbo Zhou, Jia Hu, Peter Mihajlik, Tamas Sziranyi
arXiv:2601. 07565v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal emotion understanding requires the integration of heterogeneous data sources, including text, audio, and visual modalities, while simultaneously addressing discrete emotion recognition and continuous sentiment analysis.
By Jiaqi Qiao, Xinran Li, Yifan Lyu, Xiujuan Xu, Liu Yu
arXiv:2608. 14767v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated vehicles must explain their decisions in ways that passengers can understand, monitor, and trust.
By Ashkan Yousefi Zadeh, Zishuo Zhu, Xiaomeng Li, Andry Rakotonirainy, Sebastien Glaser, Ronald Schroeter, Patricia Delhomme, Zahra Mehraban
arXiv:2606. 02679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal systems often benefit from combining information across language, sound, and visual streams, but this benefit is not guaranteed.
By Jiyuan Liu, Liangwei Nathan Zheng, Wei Emma Zhang, Xinpei Wang, Weitong Chen
arXiv:2605. 05092v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Safe L2/L3 driving automation requires anticipating human-in-the-loop reactions during shared-control transitions.
By Haozhuang Chi, Daosheng Qiu, Hao Su, Haochen Liu, Zirui Li, Haoruo Zhang, Chen Lv
arXiv:2604. 15280v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding emotions is a fundamental ability for intelligent systems to be able to interact with humans.
By Madhav Agarwal, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris, Laura Sevilla-Lara, Steven McDonagh
arXiv:2606. 00170v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In recent years, emotion recognition based on physiological signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG) has gained considerable attention, as internal physiological data offer greater objectivity and reliability compared to external behavioral data like facial expressions.
By Zheng Wang, Shuo Wang, Junhong Wang
arXiv:2607. 12774v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This article presents our results for the 11th Affective Behavior Analysis in-the-Wild (ABAW) competition.
By Aleksei Bakin, Andrey V. Savchenko
arXiv:2607. 14702v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic recognition of ambivalence and hesitancy is challenging because these states may be expressed through inconsistent linguistic, acoustic, facial, and contextual patterns, while top-performing systems often rely on computationally expensive ensembles.
By Elena Ryumina (St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences), Maxim Markitantov (St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences), Alexandr Axyonov (St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences), Fedor Shchetinin (HSE University, St. Petersburg, Russia), Timur Abdulkadirov (St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences), Dmitry Ryumin (St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences), Alexey Karpov (St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences)
arXiv:2606. 00851v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Empathetic spoken dialogue systems must infer a user's emotional state to respond appropriately, yet everyday speech often carries weak, neutral, or ambiguous affective cues.
By Sukru Samet Dindar, Riki Shimizu, Xilin Jiang, Nima Mesgarani
arXiv:2607. 16760v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Driver monitoring systems (DMS) increasingly rely on facial cues to infer drowsiness, distraction, and cognitive load in real time.
By Sai Sidharth D