Interpretability offers a solution to safe autonomy by providing transparency into an agent's underlying decision-making model. Within sequential-decision making tasks, differentiable decision trees (...
arXiv:2608. 07151v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning policies are difficult to inspect, but interpreting them is a prerequisite for trustworthiness.
By Mark Leon Ringer, Michel Tokic
arXiv:2607. 07235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Explainability remains a key issue in reinforcement learning (RL).
By Ignacio D. Lopez-Miguel, Ezio Bartocci, Thomas Eiter, Martin Tappler
arXiv:2609.36471v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: World-Action Models (WAMs) improve robotic manipulation by conditioning action generation on predicted future observations, but future prediction add...
By Guoheng Sun, Chen Chen, Jin Wang, Ang Li, Teresa Lv
arXiv:2606. 08596v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constructing efficient and reliable policies to assist humans is indispensable for human-AI collaboration.
By Beiwen Zhang, Yongheng Liang, Guowei Zou, Haitao Wang, Hejun Wu
arXiv:2602. 14265v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-Time-Compute (ITC) methods like Best-of-$n$ and Tree-of-Thoughts are meant to produce output candidates that are both high-quality and diverse, but their use of high-temperature sampling often fails to achieve meaningful output diversity.
By Zachary Bamberger, Till R. Saenger, Gilad Morad, Ofra Amir, Brandon M. Stewart, Amir Feder
arXiv:2608. 07581v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Group-based reinforcement learning methods for multimodal large language models typically rely on trajectory-level credit assignment that applies a single advantage to all tokens in a response.
By Shuai Lyu, Yuning Gong, Ruiling Gao, Xiaoran Shang, Zhonghong Ou, Ping Zong, Yifan Zhu, Yuan Sun, Yang Qin, Peng Hu
arXiv:2608.30640v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While self-supervised approaches to reinforcement learning have achieved strong results by learning representations of states and actions, a key open q...
By Michal Korniak, Kamil Dybek, Benjamin Eysenbach, Marco Bagatella, Micha{\l} Bortkiewicz
Large language model (LLM) agents for long-horizon interactive tasks typically follow a ReAct-style protocol, issuing one primitive action per LLM round. While this enables frequent replanning, it is...
arXiv:2606. 04634v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trust in a decision-making system requires both safety guarantees and the ability to interpret and understand its behavior.
By Sabine Rieder, Stefan Pranger, Debraj Chakraborty, Jan K\v{r}et\'insk\'y, Bettina K\"onighofer
The paper introduces SPACE, a method for enabling large language model agents to emit variable-length action chunks in long-horizon tasks. By distilling chunk-boundary supervision from programmatic skills derived from successful trajectories, SPACE overcomes the tendency of agents to either act one step at a time or commit to overly long sequences. Experiments on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld demonstrate that SPACE raises success rates by 7.0%–31.3% and cuts LLM decision rounds by up to 78.9%.
By Yanting Yang, Can Jin, Jinman Zhao, Jiahao Wu, Yang Zhou, Zhepeng Wang, Zhendong Wang, Mu Zhou, Dimitris N. Metaxas
The paper introduces the Dual-Latent World Model (Dual-WM), which separates local execution and long-range planning into distinct latent spaces and dynamics models. A new learning method, Long-Horizon Representation Learning with Weighted Rollout (LoRe), supervises predictions at both levels using exponential horizon weights. Experiments on five goal-conditioned visual control tasks show that Dual-WM improves success rates over strong baselines, especially at longer horizons.
By Delin Zhao, Zhengrong Yue, Shaobin Zhuang, Junlin He, Xiaoyu Chen, Zikang Wang, Yuxin Liu, Limin Wang, Yali Wang