arXiv Machine Learning By Sabine Rieder, Stefan Pranger, Debraj Chakraborty, Jan K\v{r}et\'insk\'y, Bettina K\"onighofer

Explainably Safe Reinforcement Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 04634v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Trust in a decision-making system requires both safety guarantees and the ability to interpret and understand its behavior.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 21

Adaptive Probabilistic Shielding by Learning MDPs for Safe Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2608. 19836v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Probabilistic shielding is a technique for safe reinforcement learning (RL).

By Astrid Horn Brorholt (Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark), Maris F. L. Galesloot (Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands), Nils Jansen (Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands), Kim Guldstrand Larsen (Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark), Christian Schilling (Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark)
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Evaluation Metrics for Safe Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces new evaluation metrics for safe reinforcement learning that go beyond average safety guarantees by examining how often and how severely safety bounds are violated, consistency across tasks and bounds, and the relationship between training-time and final policy behavior. It also proposes a safety tier system for categorizing algorithms and presents empirical safety evaluations on multiple navigation tasks. The authors recommend reporting aggregate metrics, distributional data, and task‑specific results together, and provide an open‑source suite, SafeRLEval, to facilitate reliable safety assessment.

By Lindsay Spoor, Aske Plaat, Thomas Moerland