Inference for PROs
Related stories
Probabilistic Circuits as Reasoning Machines in Artificial Intelligence (Part I)
arXiv:2608. 16565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This cumulative habilitation thesis studies probabilistic circuits (PCs) as a powerful and tractable framework for reasoning and learning under uncertainty in artificial intelligence (AI).
Categories of Inference-Time Scaling for Improved LLM Reasoning
And an Overview of Recent Inference-Scaling Papers
When benchmark inferences do not compose: Projectibility in AI evaluation
arXiv:2607. 26159v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: An AI benchmark result rarely reaches a consequential claim in one step.
How reliable are LLMs when it comes to playing dice?
arXiv:2606. 07515v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of large language models through a controlled benchmarking study on discrete probability problems.
Demystifying Prediction Powered Inference
arXiv:2601. 20819v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning predictions are increasingly used to supplement incomplete or costly-to-measure outcomes in fields such as biomedical research, environmental science, and social science.
Solution of the Hempel's statistical ambiguity problem and Causal AI
arXiv:2607. 12826v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper addresses Carl Hempel's longstanding problem of statistical ambiguity in inductive-statistical inference, in which contradictory predictions are derived from statistical laws.
GamePad: A learning environment for theorem proving
How to Verify Consistency of Probabilistic Claims
arXiv:2608. 11181v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When a probabilistic predictor answers many conditional-probability queries, are its answers self-consistent, and can this be verified in polynomial time?
Revealed Rationality: Label-Free Evaluation and Regularization from Representation Theorems
arXiv:2608. 05015v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Representation theorems in decision theory establish that behavior satisfies certain axioms if and only if it can be rationalized by a well-defined objective.
Solution of the Hempel's statistical ambiguity problem and Causal AI
This paper addresses Carl Hempel's longstanding problem of statistical ambiguity in inductive-statistical inference, in which contradictory predictions are derived from statistical laws. To avoid such predictions, Carl Hempel proposed the Requirement of Maximal Specificity (RMS) for the statistical laws used in the inference.
