arXiv Computer Vision

LayoutMamba: Efficient Document Layout Analysis with Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Networks

arXiv AI
Jun 4

MM-BizRAG: Rethinking Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for General Purpose Enterprise Q&A

arXiv:2606. 04231v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (MM-RAG) have shifted toward minimal parsing, relying on page-level images for producing retriever embeddings and for answer generation.

By Hanoz Bhathena, Parin Rajesh Jhaveri, Rohan Mittal, Prateek Singh, Aymen Kallala, Rachneet Kaur, Yiqiao Jin, Zhen Zeng, Adwait Ratnaparkhi, Denis Kochedykov
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

Beyond Atomic Layouts: Compositional Design Understanding with Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces a new task called compositional layout understanding, focusing on interpreting complex, multi‑layer document and UI designs. It presents CoDeLayout, a VQA dataset of about 20,000 real‑world layouts annotated with compositional element pairs and design intent. The authors identify semantic drift and structural ambiguity as key challenges for vision‑language models and propose MASON, a post‑training approach that combines multimodal alignment and structural perception to improve performance, achieving 91.66% accuracy with only 30% of the training data.

By Yiyang Huang, Zhaowen Wang, Simon Jenni, Jing Shi, Yitian Zhang, Yizhou Wang, Yun Fu
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 15

Read, Parse, Describe: Unified Document Parsing with Visual Element Description Generation

arXiv:2610.20335v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Document understanding systems are typically evaluated as separate components via layout analysis, optical text recognition, reading-order prediction,...

By Yuheng Chen, Yufan Chen, Zhuojun Cai, Ruiping Liu, Junwei Zheng, Jiale Wei, Di Wen, Weijia Fan, Kunyu Peng, Jiaming Zhang, Rainer Stiefelhagen
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 27

Beyond Atomic Layouts: Compositional Design Understanding with Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces a new task called compositional layout understanding, focusing on interpreting complex, multi-layer document and UI layouts that involve hierarchical relationships among visually entangled elements. It presents CoDeLayout, a VQA dataset of about 20,000 real-world layouts annotated with compositional element pairs and design intent, and identifies two main challenges for current vision‑language models: semantic drift between textual metadata and visual content, and structural ambiguity in hierarchical inter‑element relationships. To address these, the authors propose MASON, a post‑training paradigm that combines multimodal alignment and structural perception, achieving a 91.66% accuracy on CoDeLayout and outperforming full‑data direct fine‑tuning with only 30% of the training data.

arXiv AI
Jul 17

Towards Hierarchical Structure Understanding of Newspaper Images

arXiv:2607. 15082v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding newspaper images remains a challenging task due to their complex, nested hierarchical structures and dense, heterogeneous layouts.

By William Moca\"er, Sol\`ene Tarride, Thomas Constum, Merveilles Agbeti-Messan, Tom Simon, Cl\'ement Chatelain, St\'ephane Nicolas, Pierrick Tranouez, S\'ebastien Cretin, Thierry Paquet
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6

PaDoc: Layout-Grounded Parallel Decoding for Document Parsing

End-to-end document parsers provide a unified interface, but serialize page layouts and regional contents into one autoregressive sequence. This formulation forces independent regions onto a decoding path whose length grows with the total content, whereas crop-based two-stage parsers expose region-level parallelism at the cost of repeated visual prefills and fragmented page context.

arXiv Computation and Language
6d ago

DocXEval: A Systematic Evaluation of Explainability in Multimodal Document Understanding

DocXEval is the first comprehensive framework that adapts existing explainable AI methods and evaluation metrics to multimodal document understanding, covering text, layout, and image modalities. The authors systematically evaluate 13 XAI methods across 3 tasks, 8 datasets, 4 models, and 17 metrics, finding that Occlusion consistently performs best in faithfulness and interpretability. The study also provides meta‑evaluation insights, diagnostic analyses of modality contributions, spatial attribution patterns, and potential dataset biases, offering a benchmark and practical guide for future research.

By Saifullah Saifullah, David Dembinsky, Stefan Agne, Andreas Dengel, Sheraz Ahmed