arXiv:2602. 15257v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present the first comprehensive, large-scale study of training long-context vision language models up to 344K context, targeting long-document visual question answering with measured transfer to long-context text.
By Austin Veselka
arXiv:2607. 07179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents.
By Miguel Lopez-Duran, Elena Marrero, Julian Fierrez, Marta Robledo-Moreno, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Daniel DeAlcala, Aythami Morales, Ruben Tolosana, Oscar Delgado, Alvaro Ortigosa, Javier Ortega-Garcia
arXiv:2609.13158v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Vision--Language Models (LVLMs) are increasingly expected to perform visual question answering (VQA) over planar media. However, existing planar...
By Yongqi Yu, Yu Zhang
Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance in text-vision tasks, their robustness and transferability to different document domains remains underexplored.
arXiv:2607. 09068v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advancements in LVLMs necessitate robust benchmarks for complex, visually grounded reasoning.
By Yang Chen, Yunwen Li, Yufan Shen, Minghao Liu, Tianyu Zheng, Bin Fu, Qunshu Lin, Zhi Yu, Botian Shi
The paper introduces a new task called compositional layout understanding, focusing on interpreting complex, multi‑layer document and UI designs. It presents CoDeLayout, a VQA dataset of about 20,000 real‑world layouts annotated with compositional element pairs and design intent. The authors identify semantic drift and structural ambiguity as key challenges for vision‑language models and propose MASON, a post‑training approach that combines multimodal alignment and structural perception to improve performance, achieving 91.66% accuracy with only 30% of the training data.
By Yiyang Huang, Zhaowen Wang, Simon Jenni, Jing Shi, Yitian Zhang, Yizhou Wang, Yun Fu