arXiv:2411. 11436v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In this paper, we address the problem of feature selection in the context of multi-label learning, by using a new estimator based on implicit regularization and label embedding.
arXiv:2608. 16148v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-view multi-label feature selection aims to identify a compact and informative feature subset from heterogeneous views while preserving discriminative information for multiple labels.
arXiv:2606. 05927v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The complex imbalanced label distribution poses a crucial challenge to multi-label classification, as most classifiers are biased towards the majority class and high-frequent labels.
The paper introduces MORE-PLR, a method that tackles the partial label ranking problem by employing multi-output regression. It uses an encoder to transform incomplete rankings with ties into regression targets during training, and applies post‑hoc layers during inference to convert regression outputs into bucket orders. Experiments show that this framework competes with state‑of‑the‑art partial label ranking methods.
arXiv:2604. 06614v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Prompt learning has gained significant attention as a parameter-efficient approach for adapting large pre-trained vision-language models to downstream tasks.
arXiv:2603. 05060v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi--task learning seeks to improve the generalization error by leveraging the common information shared by multiple related tasks.
arXiv:2607. 12704v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-label classification assigns several co-occurring labels to each aerial scene, yet deployed models often encounter data distributions different from their training.
Deep learning has achieved great success in recent years thanks to the availability of high-quality, well-annotated training data. However, this requirement is often not met in real-world applications.
The paper examines the common practice of aggregating multiple labels per instance into a single ‘true’ label for supervised learning. By creating a theoretical model, the authors show that using the full, non‑aggregated label information can make it easier to train well‑calibrated models, though the benefits depend on the specific problem. They predict when non‑aggregated labels will improve learning and validate these predictions on real datasets.
arXiv:2601. 08446v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The development of reliable methods for multi-label classification (MLC) has become a prominent research direction in remote sensing (RS).
arXiv:2603. 24025v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Unsupervised learning of high-dimensional data is challenging due to irrelevant or noisy features obscuring underlying structures.
arXiv:2607. 07513v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-supervised learning matches supervised accuracy from a fraction of the labels, but the labeled-sample efficiency behind this has lacked a theoretical explanation.
arXiv:2512.12870v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Active Learning (AL) is commonly used in applications where labeling data is expensive or time-consuming. In practice, however, labels are of...