arXiv AI
Active Learning with Imperfect Labels: Optimal Labeler Assignment and Sample Selection
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Deep Active Re-Labeling: Toward Noise-Resilient Annotation Efficiency
arXiv:2606. 08718v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Deep Active Learning (DAL) effectively reduces human annotation costs, its efficacy is constrained by human annotation errors.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 24
Benchmarking noisy label detection methods
arXiv:2510.16211v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Label noise is a common problem in real-world datasets, affecting both model training and validation. Clean data are essential for achieving strong...
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Active Learning with Foundation Model Priors: Efficient Learning under Class Imbalance
arXiv:2606. 07630v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world datasets across image and text domains are often characterized by skewed class distributions and noisy annotations, which jointly degrade model performance, particularly on minority classes.
arXiv AI
Aug 5
How Many Labels Are Enough? ALDA: Active Learning Deployment Advisor for Medical Image Classification
arXiv:2608. 03511v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Active learning (AL) promises to reduce the cost of medical imaging projects by lowering the number of clinical labels required.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 16
Benchmarking Instance-Dependent Label Noise with Controlled Corruptions
arXiv:2606. 14965v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic instance-dependent label noise (IDN) benchmarks are widely used to evaluate noisy-label learning methods, yet existing approaches typically generate noise through imperfect annotators or classifier raters, leaving the source of ambiguity implicit.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11
A Data-Centric Framework for Detecting and Correcting Corrupted Labels
arXiv:2606. 11699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance of machine learning and deep learning models largely depends on the quality of the training data.