Submodular Information Measures (SIMs) have recently emerged as a powerful framework for representation learning and multimodal learning. In particular, the SCORE framework~\cite{majee2024score} demonstrated that SIMs can serve as effective objectives for supervised contrastive learning.
arXiv:2609.23533v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal classifiers can converge to modality-dominant solutions in which one modality dominates the joint prediction, suppressing the learning of ot...
By Zechang Xiong, Da Li, Rong Yin, Kexin Tang, Biao Yang, Pengyuan Li, Wenkang Kong, Yulan Hu, Shengyu Zhu, Hao Peng
arXiv:2608. 10857v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Determining the complexity, or Intrinsic Dimension (ID), of data is fundamental to efficient and interpretable representation learning.
By Viktoria Schuster, Sana Tonekaboni, Caroline Uhler
arXiv:2609.17094v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal representation learning seeks shared representations for cross-modal retrieval and knowledge transfer. Hub-based binding reduces pairwise su...
By Ying Guo, Haidong Chen, Linrui Xu, Xiaohao Liu, Chuancheng Shi, Canran Xiao, Dan Zhang, Fei Shen, Li Shen, Tat-Seng Chua
Multimodal representation learning seeks shared representations for cross-modal retrieval and knowledge transfer. Hub-based binding reduces pairwise supervision costs, but separate hub connections can...
arXiv:2606. 02172v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning discriminative visual representations from distributed, heterogeneous data is a fundamental challenge in Federated Learning (FL).
By Mario Casado-Diez, Alejandro Dopico-Castro, Ver\'onica Bol\'on-Canedo, Bertha Guijarro-Berdi\~nas
The paper introduces COVER, a multi‑task learning framework that regularizes covariate overlap to mitigate the negative effects of sharing information across tasks with differing covariate distributions and response relationships. COVER blends a common component function, a shared neural representation, and low‑dimensional task‑specific coefficients, using taskwise second‑moment matrices to guide coefficient integration. The authors provide theoretical bias‑variance analysis, oracle inequalities, and neural‑network convergence rates, and demonstrate that COVER outperforms existing deep‑learning and statistical integration methods in simulations and a GTEx central‑nervous‑system study.
By Yang Sui, Qi Xu, Yang Bai, Annie Qu
arXiv:2506. 08774v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Different machine learning models can represent the same underlying concept in different ways.
By Fan Xu, Luis A. Leiva
arXiv:2606. 11190v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-modal alignment (CA) and cross-modal prediction (CP) are the dominant paradigms for multimodal representation learning, yet there is no systematic understanding of when each succeeds, when each fails, and when cross-modal training helps at all -- a gap that leaves practitioners, especially in scientific domains like biomedicine or astrophysics, with heterogeneous instruments and multiple levels of organization and measurement, unable to diagnose why standard methods underperform the best single modality.
By Ilay Kamai, Hugues Van Assel, Aviv Regev, Hagai B. Perets, Randall Balestriero
arXiv:2608. 02769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal supervised learning seeks to leverage multiple heterogeneous data sources to improve predictive performance.
By Sagnik Nandy, Samriddha Lahiry, Pragya Sur, Subhabrata Sen
The paper introduces MEQ, a mutual feedback architecture that iteratively refines two multimodal inputs into coupled embeddings, each embedding incorporating information from the other. By continuously exchanging information between the modalities, the model converges to a fixed point that improves representation quality. Experiments on classification and visual grounding tasks show that MEQ achieves competitive or superior performance compared to concatenation-based baselines, and qualitatively enhances visual grounding when paired with complementary modalities.
By Ho-min Park, Byungkon Kang
Cross-modal alignment (CA) and cross-modal prediction (CP) are the dominant paradigms for multimodal representation learning, yet there is no systematic understanding of when each succeeds, when each fails, and when cross-modal training helps at all -- a gap that leaves practitioners, especially in scientific domains like biomedicine or astrophysics, with heterogeneous instruments and multiple levels of organization and measurement, unable to diagnose why standard methods underperform the best single modality. We develop a unified linear framework that addresses both questions.