arXiv:2608. 05107v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-supported care planning can help clinicians, patients, caregivers, and care teams coordinate complex decisions across clinical, functional, psychosocial, and environmental needs.
By Hung Truong Thanh Nguyen, H\'el\`ene Fournier, Piper Jackson, Makoto Itoh, Shannon Freeman, Rene Richard, Hung Cao
arXiv:2601. 05746v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent years have witnessed the rapid development of Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), which excel at collaborative decision-making and complex problem-solving.
By Zhenghao Li, Zhi Zheng, Wei Chen, Jielun Zhao, Yong Chen, Tong Xu, Enhong Chen
OmouAI is an interactive deliberation system that combines large language models with computational argumentation to facilitate policy debates involving humans and simulated personas such as stakeholders, experts, or devil’s advocates. Each persona generates its own arguments, which are assembled into a shared argumentation framework that users can contest, add to, or revise, ensuring human oversight. The system evaluates arguments using deterministic argumentative semantics against external goals like the UN Sustainable Development Goals, providing faithful explanations and indicating how policy recommendations affect those goals.
By Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Antonio Rago, William Yeoh, Georgina Curto
arXiv:2609.40103v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as automated judges for AI-generated content, yet a single judge is unreliable and even a panel...
By Mufeng Yang, Junwei Yu, Yepeng Ding
arXiv:2604. 09679v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is a collaborative framework in which multiple agents iteratively refine solutions through the generation of reasoning and alternating critique cycles.
By Yiqing Liu, Hantao Yao, Wu Liu, Allen He, Yongdong Zhang
arXiv:2607. 07761v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as important tools in healthcare, showing growing potential for clinical reasoning and patient care.
By Qi Peng, Jiatong Li, Sirui Huang, Yiyang Jiang, Kaisong Gong, Ronger Ding, Shijie Ye, Changmeng Zheng, Yi Cai, Xiaobo Yang, Jin Huang, Xiao-Yong Wei, Qing Li
arXiv:2606. 04632v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mechanical ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) requires balancing competing physiological goals, including oxygenation, lung protection, and acid-base homeostasis.
By Teqi Hao, Yuxuan Fu, Xiaoyu Tan, Shaojie Shi, Bohao Lv, Yinghui Xu, Xihe Qiu
Organizational decisions are co-created while evidence, constraints, and human priorities continue to evolve. In conventional transcript-based multi-agent systems, humans typically provide an initial problem, agents deliberate internally, and the system returns a final response.
arXiv:2608. 13046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organizational decisions are co-created while evidence, constraints, and human priorities continue to evolve.
By Sanjeev Manivannan
arXiv:2608.21864v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The current progress of Clinical Vision Large Language Models (C-VLLMs) has substantially improved digital diagnostics, still these frameworks often...
By Md Asaduzzaman Jabin, Zihao Wu, Tianming Liu
The paper proposes a theory for judging post-hoc debates in AI, focusing on properties like reproducibility, robustness, groundedness, and explainability. It evaluates two debate‑judgement methods—LLM judges and formal computational argumentation semantics—finding similar accuracy but noting that argumentation semantics offers stronger formal guarantees. The study suggests that argumentation semantics is a preferable framework for principled debate judges in AI systems.
By Xiang Yin, Adam Dejl, Antonio Rago, Lihu Chen, Francesca Toni
arXiv:2607. 26212v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) is a promising paradigm for improving the accuracy and robustness of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agentic systems.
By Quim Motger, Marc Oriol, Jordi Marco, Xavier Franch