arXiv:2511.07011v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Background: Remotely captured spoken language could provide objective, regular indicators of depression symptom severity. However, research t...
arXiv:2605.22286v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Text-based counseling provides a valuable source of information for assessing depression severity. We study prediction of the total score on...
arXiv:2608. 07316v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Natural Language Processing (NLP) models predicting mental health outcomes rarely specify what they measure: contextual knowledge, emotional content, or syntactic structure.
The study investigates how a large language model, Gemma-3-27B-PT, internally represents depressive symptoms. By applying mechanistic interpretability methods to the model’s residual stream, researchers found that symptom groups are geometrically distinct at layer 21, and that projected symptom vectors align with clinician-annotated rankings across mood, somatic, and suicidality dimensions. Additionally, a single depression vector at this layer can differentiate depressive from non-depressive text with an AUC of 0.789, suggesting a potential emotional valence gate for symptom projection.
The study compares six approaches—frontier commercial models, fine‑tuned smaller models, and conventional classifiers—for detecting anxiety in Reddit posts. It reveals a significant lexical bias: 69.3% of anxiety‑labelled posts contain the word "anxiety" or a variant, allowing models to perform well via keyword matching rather than true language understanding. After removing these terms, the frontier model still leads (F1 = 0.846), but a 110 M‑parameter domain‑adapted encoder achieves a close score (F1 = 0.831) without external API calls, and lexical dependence varies widely across models.
The study examines how large language models (LLMs) predict depression scores from language responses. In a "Mirror" setup, participants answered structured diagnostic interviews that the LLMs used to predict scores, yielding near-perfect predictions. In a "Non-Mirror" setup, participants gave life history interviews; the LLMs still achieved outstanding prediction accuracy, and both conditions correlated similarly with PHQ-9 scores, indicating that the Mirror advantage disappears when predicting an independent measure. Topic modeling showed different depression themes across interview types, suggesting Mirror evaluations are more about reliability than validity and that Non-Mirror approaches may enhance clinical relevance.
arXiv:2604.27846v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How people narrate their experiences offers a window into how the mind organizes them. Computational approaches to therapeutic writing have evolved...
This study benchmarks transformer models for Bangla medical named entity recognition (NER), comparing BanglaBERT, multilingual BERT (mBERT), XLM‑RoBERTa, and GPT‑4o mini under zero‑shot and few‑shot prompting. Across a full test set of 3,179 samples, fine‑tuned XLM‑RoBERTa achieves a new state‑of‑the‑art F1‑score of 0.5959, while BanglaBERT lags with 0.4937, suggesting that domain diversity outweighs language specificity. The analysis shows high performance on Medicine and Specialist entities (F1 > 0.83) but lower accuracy on Symptoms (F1 0.4367), and demonstrates that fine‑tuned transformers outperform prompt‑only approaches by a factor of 3.76.
arXiv:2602. 11177v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliable early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging, particularly due to the limited availability of labeled data.
The authors present the Cross-Platform Fairness Evaluation (CPFE) framework, a five‑axis audit protocol that assesses discriminative performance, calibration, statistical significance, prediction equity, and attribution stability of transformer models. Applying CPFE to four models trained on a Kaggle mental‑health corpus and tested on Reddit and Twitter, they find substantial cross‑platform degradation in AUC (30–40%) and severe calibration failures (ECE rising to 0.5 on Twitter). The study demonstrates that platform‑specific temperature scaling can largely fix calibration without harming discrimination, while prediction equity and attribution stability analyses reveal significant disparities and vocabulary divergence across platforms. The results argue that cross‑platform validation across all CPFE axes should become a standard requirement for mental‑health NLP systems deployed in heterogeneous environments.
arXiv:2505.12196v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The impressive linguistic abilities of large language models (LLMs) have recommended them as models of human sentence processing, with some conject...
The study evaluates eleven autoregressive transformer models on English agreement attraction scenarios using a surprisal-based approach. Results show that while transformers match human reading times for prepositional phrase configurations, they perform poorly on object‑extracted relative clauses, with predictions diverging across models and failing to capture human interference patterns. The authors argue that current transformers cannot adequately model human morphosyntactic processing and call for more rigorous, comprehensive testing to avoid misleading conclusions from limited syntactic setups.