arXiv:2511.07011v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Background: Remotely captured spoken language could provide objective, regular indicators of depression symptom severity. However, research t...
arXiv:2501. 16106v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in multimodal depression recognition for clinical interviews (MDRC) have demonstrated the potential of AI systems by integrating textual, acoustic, and facial cues.
The study investigates how a large language model, Gemma-3-27B-PT, internally represents depressive symptoms. By applying mechanistic interpretability methods to the model’s residual stream, researchers found that symptom groups are geometrically distinct at layer 21, and that projected symptom vectors align with clinician-annotated rankings across mood, somatic, and suicidality dimensions. Additionally, a single depression vector at this layer can differentiate depressive from non-depressive text with an AUC of 0.789, suggesting a potential emotional valence gate for symptom projection.
arXiv:2604.27846v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How people narrate their experiences offers a window into how the mind organizes them. Computational approaches to therapeutic writing have evolved...
arXiv:2606. 11197v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech-based automatic estimation of depression levels is essential for enabling early detection and timely intervention, particularly in resource-constrained mental health settings.
arXiv:2607. 25679v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal behavioral analysis offers a scalable approach to assessing depression, anxiety, and stress, yet generic fusion models often ignore the psychometric structure of questionnaire labels.
arXiv:2608.31007v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how psychiatric patients subjectively experienced a clinical conversation is important for feedback and alliance-related process monito...
arXiv:2610.27567v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Depression assessment from counseling speech requires integrating textual and acoustic psychological evidence across turns, yet existing end-to-end c...
LongCounsel-8 is a new benchmark suite comprising three datasets with 7,749 five‑session counseling dialogues, each grounded in real client profiles, depression trajectories, symptom compositions, and counseling patterns. The benchmark addresses challenges of longitudinal consistency, empirical grounding of symptom progression, and natural expression of controlled depression states without exposing labels. Experiments show that lower single‑session error does not ensure accurate trend detection, methods perform worse on worsening trajectories, and adding more session history can reduce trend prediction accuracy.
EviDial is a new benchmark for depression dialogue that separates label agreement from evidence grounding. It contains 382 dialogues and 2,744 participant-symptom cells, each annotated as absent, partial, conflicting, or sufficient evidence. The study finds that most predictions that match benchmark labels lack sufficient textual evidence, highlighting a gap between label accuracy and evidence-based assessment.
The paper examines automatic depression detection from doctor‑patient conversations and finds that models trained on semi‑structured interview data can achieve high accuracy by exploiting fixed interviewer prompts rather than the participants’ language. Across three datasets (ANDROIDS, DAIC‑WOZ, E‑DAIC), the authors show that restricting models to participant utterances distributes decision evidence more broadly and reflects genuine linguistic cues. The study highlights a cross‑dataset, architecture‑agnostic bias introduced by interviewer prompts and calls for analyses that localize decision evidence by time and speaker to ensure models learn from participants’ language.
The paper introduces a two‑stage framework for recognizing depression symptoms at the sentence level. First, a contrastively fine‑tuned sentence encoder generates a symptom candidate for each sentence. Then, a fine‑tuned language model verifies the candidate’s presence or absence by comparing the sentence, its context, and a diagnostic definition, ensuring the model’s judgment aligns with that definition before responding.