arXiv Machine Learning

Parallel Adaptive Multi-Objective Evolutionary Learning of Discretized Bayesian Network Classifiers for Clinical Data

arXiv:2605. 29058v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bayesian Networks (BNs) are of interest from an explainable AI viewpoint, offering transparent probabilistic models for decision support.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Interpretable and Calibrated Classification of Clinical Data Using Supervised Feature Binarization

The paper introduces a statistically grounded framework for interpretable, rule-based clinical classification using Bernoulli Naïve Bayes (BNB). It employs supervised chi‑square‑guided binarization to convert continuous medical variables into binary indicators, enabling BNB to handle continuous data while maintaining transparency. On three benchmark datasets—Pima Indians Diabetes, Wisconsin Breast Cancer, and Heart Failure Prediction—the method achieved AUCs of 0.800, 0.984, and 0.919, respectively, and demonstrated reliable probability calibration through cross‑validated analysis and post‑hoc beta calibration.

By Antony Garcia, Adrian Noriega, Gabrielle Britton, Xinming Huang
arXiv AI
Jun 8

REMEDI: A Benchmark for Retention and Unlearning Evaluation in Multi-label Clinical Disease Inference

arXiv:2606. 07141v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models trained for clinical disease inference are trained on patient data, which may include sensitive and private information, and data owners may request the removal of their data from a trained model due to privacy or copyright concerns.

By Anurag Sharma, Sai Teja Chunchu, Prasenjit Mitra, Sandipan Sikdar, Koustav Rudra
arXiv AI
Sep 12

Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection

The paper introduces ACTMED, a diagnostic framework that combines Bayesian Experimental Design with large language models to emulate real‑world clinical reasoning. ACTMED actively selects the most informative test at each step, using LLMs to simulate patient states and update beliefs without needing task‑specific training data. The authors evaluate the system on real datasets, demonstrating improvements in diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and efficient resource use while keeping clinicians involved in the decision loop.

By Silas Ruhrberg Est\'evez, Nicol\'as Astorga, Mihaela van der Schaar
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Rethinking How We Evaluate Methodological Progress in Health AI

The study re‑implements 12 AI algorithms for electronic health records within a unified framework and evaluates them on MIMIC‑IV and NWICU datasets. It compares expert‑authored clinically meaningful tasks with randomly generated tasks, finding that pairwise algorithm comparisons transfer well across task families and datasets, yet clinically meaningful tasks show stronger task‑method interactions. The results also reveal that newer algorithms do not consistently outperform older ones, with gradient‑boosted trees remaining highly competitive when combined with modern EHR representations.

By Florent Pollet, Matthew McDermott
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Hierarchical Sparse Bayesian Multitask Learning for Disease Prediction in Pooled Microbiome Studies

This paper introduces a hierarchical Bayesian multitask learning model that assumes a shared sparsity structure across different binary classification tasks. The authors develop a variational inference algorithm for efficient posterior approximation and evaluate the method on synthetic data and pooled microbiome studies. Results show superior support recovery in synthetic experiments and robust, well‑calibrated predictions with informative taxa selection in microbiome classification.

By Haonan Zhu, Andre R. Goncalves, Camilo Valdes, Hiranmayi Ranganathan, Boya Zhang, Jose Manuel Mart\'i, Car Reen Kok, Monica K. Borucki, Nisha J. Mulakken, James B. Thissen, Crystal Jaing, Alfred Hero, Nicholas A. Be