arXiv Machine Learning

NeuroRule: Making Black-Box Neural Networks Explainable through Rule-set Evolution

NeuroRule is a knowledge distillation framework that transforms high‑capacity neural networks into explainable rule‑sets. It adapts the EVOTER rule‑set evolution infrastructure to evolve propositional logic expressions that capture the neural network’s performance. The approach includes a conciseness objective to enhance explainability and demonstrates viability even without access to the original training data.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Neuron Activation-based Computation of Logical Explanations for Deep Neural Networks

The paper introduces a flexible symbolic framework that efficiently computes logical explanations for deep neural networks by parameterizing explanations with internal neuron activations and leveraging general-purpose logical engines like SMT solvers. Unlike previous methods that rely on specialized verifiers or are limited to individual input features, this approach is not restricted in shape and can scale to deep architectures. Experiments on image recognition and medical benchmarks demonstrate improved computational efficiency and the ability to explain networks that were previously intractable for logic-based methods.

By Tom\'a\v{s} Kol\'arik, Faezeh Labbaf, Fabrizio Leopardi, Grigory Fedyukovich, Michael Wand, Natasha Sharygina
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

Think-Verify-Revise: Neuro-Symbolic Visual Reasoning with Vision-Language Models and Dynamic Logic Tensor Networks

The paper introduces a Neuro‑Symbolic framework that integrates a Vision‑Language Model (VLM) for automatic induction of First‑Order Logic (FOL) rules with a Dynamic Logic Tensor Network (D‑LTN) for differentiable rule verification. In a closed iterative loop, the VLM proposes candidate rules (Think), the D‑LTN verifies them against visual embeddings (Verify), and failures guide the VLM to refine its hypotheses (Revise). Evaluated on the ViSudo‑PC benchmark across four visual domains, the system successfully induces Sudoku constraint rules from only three training examples and achieves AUC scores that match or surpass prior methods such as NeuPSL and LTN.

By Homayoun Afshari, Pietro Basci, Alessandro Russo, Lia Morra
arXiv AI
6d ago

A Synthetic Ground-Truth Framework for the Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods

The paper introduces a synthetic ground‑truth framework for evaluating explainable AI (XAI) methods, addressing the lack of reliable evaluation procedures. By using controlled interventions to create datasets where the importance of input components is known, the framework generates ground‑truth explanations that align with the model’s actual decision process. The authors apply this approach to binary images, tabular data, and time series, and find that nine popular XAI methods exhibit significant limitations, underscoring the need for intervention‑based benchmarks.

By Miquel Mir\'o-Nicolau, Francesco Spinnato, Riccardo Guidotti
arXiv AI
Aug 6

The RAIL Principles for Neurosymbolic AI: Reasoning, Assurances, Interfacing and Learning

arXiv:2608. 04285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neurosymbolic AI systems that integrate machine learning and symbolic reasoning are rapidly gaining attention.

By Agnese Chiatti, Michael Cochez, Cristina Cornelio, Sebastijan Dumancic, Artur d'Avila Garcez, Luis C. Lamb, Lia Morra, Mathias Niepert, Robert Peharz, Alberto Speranzon, Maarten Stol, Annette Ten Teije, Thiviyan Thanapalasingam, Frank Van Harmelen, Emile Van Krieken, Antonio Vergari, Benjie Wang