arXiv AI

Concise and Logically Consistent Conformal Sets for Neuro-Symbolic Concept-Based Models

arXiv AI
2d ago

Auto-Formalizing Neuro-Symbolic Predictors

arXiv:2610.01519v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictors incorporate prior knowledge into the prediction process of neural networks, ensuring that outputs satisfy specified...

By Samuele Bortolotti, Weixin Chen, Han Zhao, Andrea Passerini, Stefano Teso, Antonio Vergari
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 16

Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic Verification

arXiv:2601. 22642v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities, yet their stochastic next-token prediction creates logical inconsistencies and reward hacking that formal symbolic systems avoid.

By Chuxue Cao, Jinluan Yang, Haoran Li, Kunhao Pan, Zijian Zhao, Zhengyu Chen, Yuchen Tian, Lijun Wu, Conghui He, Sirui Han, Yike Guo
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Neuro-symbolic AI for Industrial Configuration

The paper "Neuro-symbolic AI for Industrial Configuration" discusses how Large Language Models (LLMs) fall short for industrial product configuration due to their probabilistic nature, which conflicts with the need for syntactically valid, semantically consistent outputs that align with extensive feature and rule knowledge bases. It proposes Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI as a promising solution, outlining three integration strategies—hybrid inference, hybrid fine‑tuning, and hybrid training—and presents a taxonomy of these approaches. The authors describe their efforts to implement a NeSy-based configuration copilot, derive practical design choices for trustworthy AI deployment in engineering settings, and highlight key research challenges, especially scaling NeSy methods from academic prototypes to full‑scale industrial configurators.

By Danilo Valerio, Philipp Kogler, Stefan Bischof, Thomas Hubauer, Huzefa Rangwala
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Neuro-symbolic PRM: Enhancing Scientific Reasoning via Structured Traces and Symbolic Verification

The paper introduces a neuro‑symbolic framework for scientific reasoning that separates symbolic validity and semantic groundedness. A deterministic symbolic verifier acts as a hard filter to guarantee syntactic and arithmetic correctness, while a Process Reward Model (PRM) is trained on verifier‑accepted steps to assess contextual grounding. The authors propose Counterfactual Symbolic Perturbation (CSP) to generate hard negative examples that pass the verifier but are logically flawed, enabling efficient PRM training and a verifier‑first constrained search at inference.

By Yuxin Zi, Cong Xu, Suparna Bhattacharya, Martin Foltin, Amit Sheth