arXiv AI

Symbol Grounding in Neuro-Symbolic AI: A Gentle Introduction to Reasoning Shortcuts

arXiv:2510. 14538v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI aims to develop deep neural networks whose predictions comply with prior knowledge encoding, e.

arXiv AI
Aug 6

The RAIL Principles for Neurosymbolic AI: Reasoning, Assurances, Interfacing and Learning

arXiv:2608. 04285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neurosymbolic AI systems that integrate machine learning and symbolic reasoning are rapidly gaining attention.

By Agnese Chiatti, Michael Cochez, Cristina Cornelio, Sebastijan Dumancic, Artur d'Avila Garcez, Luis C. Lamb, Lia Morra, Mathias Niepert, Robert Peharz, Alberto Speranzon, Maarten Stol, Annette Ten Teije, Thiviyan Thanapalasingam, Frank Van Harmelen, Emile Van Krieken, Antonio Vergari, Benjie Wang
arXiv AI
2d ago

Auto-Formalizing Neuro-Symbolic Predictors

arXiv:2610.01519v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictors incorporate prior knowledge into the prediction process of neural networks, ensuring that outputs satisfy specified...

By Samuele Bortolotti, Weixin Chen, Han Zhao, Andrea Passerini, Stefano Teso, Antonio Vergari
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Does Reasoning Mitigate Backdoor Attacks? A Neuro-Symbolic Perspective

The paper investigates whether neuro‑symbolic (NeSy) AI models, which combine neural perception with symbolic reasoning, can mitigate backdoor attacks. It presents a systematic evaluation comparing the NeSy framework DeepProbLog to baseline neural networks across eight backdoor settings and four reasoning tasks. Results indicate that NeSy models are generally more robust than pure neural models, but their resilience depends heavily on how strictly the reasoning process is enforced and its alignment with the attack target.

By Marco Antonio Corallo, Andrea Agiollo, Mauro Conti, Alberto Giaretta
arXiv AI
Jun 24

Neuro-Symbolic Drive: Rule-Grounded Faithful Reasoning for Driving VLAs

arXiv:2606. 23938v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Driving VLA models incorporating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning are attractive because they leverage pretrained VLM representations and expose intermediate decisions in natural language, yet current rationales often lack the step-by-step decision semantics needed to keep the rationale causally connected to the planned motion.

By Xiangbo Gao, Xiukun Huang, Boyu Lu, Junge Zhang, Mengjie Mao, Jiachen Li, Wei Xiong, Zhengzhong Tu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 5

Forethought: Verifiable Reasoning from Neurosymbolic Primitive Programming

Current agentic workflows usually involve decomposing user requests into sequences of tool calls with correctly resolved parameters, the results of which are processed through reasoning traces in the language model's context window. The prevailing route to improve such reasoning is test-time scaling, which trains models to search over long chains of thought; but the resulting capability is entangled in model weights, is not verifiable step-by-step, and is costly at inference.