Reflective Policy Optimization
arXiv:2406.03678v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: On-policy reinforcement learning methods, like Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), often demand extensi...
arXiv:2406.03678v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: On-policy reinforcement learning methods, like Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), often demand extensi...
We’re releasing a new class of reinforcement learning algorithms, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), which perform comparably or better than state-of-the-art approaches while being much simpler to implement and tune. PPO has become the default reinforcement learning algorithm at OpenAI because of its ease of use and good performance.
The paper investigates how reusing past samples can improve the sample efficiency of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). Two variants, wPPO-U and wPPO-BH, are introduced within a multiple importance weighting framework, each reusing data from recent iterations while preserving core PPO mechanics. The authors derive theoretical policy improvement bounds for both variants and empirically evaluate their impact on continuous control tasks.
The paper introduces Multi-step Proximal Policy Improvement (MPI), a method that refines offline reinforcement learning policies through sequential re-centered proximal steps. By modeling policies as a probability manifold, MPI interprets a wide range of offline actor objectives as a single proximal policy improvement step and extends this to multiple steps for controlled policy improvement beyond the behavior distribution. Experiments on D4RL benchmarks demonstrate that a few MPI refinements enhance strong offline baselines such as TD3+BC, ReBRAC, and IQL across many tasks, while diagnostics clarify the benefits of re-centered refinement over fixed-objective scheduling and highlight critic error limitations.
MInTRL (Minimal Intervention Reinforcement Learning) expands exploration in on-policy reinforcement learning by inserting sparse, local corrections into rollouts via a judge-intervention policy. These interventions replace erroneous suffixes and immediately return control to the main policy, allowing the agent to explore beyond its natural trajectory while maintaining on-policy data. The method uses a sequence-level advantage-regression objective, avoiding importance sampling, and demonstrates superior performance on math and code benchmarks compared to standard on-policy and off-policy baselines.
arXiv:2609.40149v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Policy regularization in offline reinforcement learning balances policy improvement against reliance on uncertain value estimates. This balance can dif...
arXiv:2509. 03456v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Off-policy evaluation (OPE) and off-policy learning (OPL) are foundational for decision-making in offline contextual bandits.
arXiv:2608.20909v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Offline RL methods commonly jointly train the actor and critic, where the critic is used to guide the actor toward higher-value actions. This coupled l...
arXiv:2603.11321v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards improves reasoning in large language models, yet on-policy learning often suffers from cold-st...
arXiv:2606. 09825v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training reinforcement learning (RL) policies from scratch is costly: it requires careful reward and environment design, extensive tuning, and substantial computation.
The paper introduces Multi-step Proximal Policy Improvement (MPI), a method that refines offline reinforcement learning policies through sequential re-centered proximal steps. By viewing policies as a probability manifold, MPI interprets a wide range of offline actor objectives as a single proximal policy improvement step and extends this to multiple steps for controlled policy improvement beyond the behavior distribution. Experiments on D4RL benchmarks demonstrate that a few MPI refinements enhance strong offline baselines such as TD3+BC, ReBRAC, and IQL, while diagnostics clarify the benefits of re-centered refinement over fixed-objective scheduling and highlight critic error limitations.