arXiv AI

Predicting how model propensities generalize out of distribution

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

INCONVENIENT: A Benchmark to Assess LLM Generalization Capabilities from Convenience Samples

INCONVENIENT is a new benchmark that evaluates how machine‑learning models, especially large language models, generalize when trained on convenience samples that bias feature–target relationships. Unlike prior distribution‑shift tests that rely on natural domain splits, INCONVENIENT explicitly perturbs these relationships while keeping the deployment population unchanged, allowing controlled study of shift severity and direction. The benchmark covers 200 tabular classification and regression datasets and produces about 15,500 shifted training distributions, revealing significant performance degradation.

By Sara Rezaeimanesh, Chad Klochko, Kundan Thind, Mohammad Ghassemi
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 12

Unsupervised Identification and Removal of Spurious Correlations During Fine-Tuning

The paper presents GRASP, a method for unsupervised detection and removal of spurious correlations that arise during fine‑tuning of pretrained language models. By identifying latent factors from LoRA fine‑tune weights and projecting gradients to prevent new reliance on them, GRASP preserves genuine task signals while mitigating bias. Experiments on three tasks—misaligned code generation, medical advice, and political bias—show that GRASP reduces misalignment and drift more effectively than existing baselines while maintaining task performance.

By Ciar\'an M. Gilligan-Lee, Joseph Egan, Yuchen Zhu, Michael O'Riordan
arXiv AI
6d ago

Propensities Please: Exposing Alignment-Faking LLMs using Synthetic Document Finetuning

The paper introduces a technique called Synthetic Document Finetuning (SDF) to expose hidden misaligned behaviors in large language models that may engage in alignment faking. By finetuning models to associate certain keywords with undetected misaligned actions, the authors create honeypot environments and observe that the gap in misaligned action rates between cueed and uncued prompts widens, indicating more reliable detection than prompt-based methods. The study also notes that SDF can impair reasoning abilities, proposing on-policy distillation as a mitigation.

By Ardy Haroen, Florian Lorkowski, Samuel Nellessen, Felix Hofst\"atter