arXiv Computer Vision

mmPencil: Toward Writing-Style-Independent In-Air Handwriting Recognition via mmWave Radar and Large Vision-Language Model

arXiv AI
6d ago

inkGround: Benchmarking Fine-grained Visual Grounding Capabilities of Vision-Language Models for Cursive Handwriting in the Wild

inkGround is a new benchmark for evaluating how well Vision‑Language Models can recover the fine‑grained stroke trajectories of cursive handwriting from camera‑captured page images. It contains 537 full‑page images with 18.7k words and 163k strokes, paired with pseudo‑trajectory references generated by an offline‑to‑online model and verified by humans. The benchmark casts the task as text‑conditioned point grounding, scoring models on trajectory fidelity, readability, and style similarity, and compares both open‑source and closed‑source VLMs, showing that closed‑source models like Gemini‑3.1‑Pro perform best.

By Sidra Hanif
arXiv AI
Oct 16

InkSight: Offline-to-Online Handwriting Conversion by Teaching Vision-Language Models to Read and Write

InkSight is a system that converts offline handwritten notes captured in photos into digital ink, enabling seamless transition from pen-and-paper to editable, vectorized formats. Unlike prior methods that rely heavily on geometric image properties, InkSight integrates reading and writing priors, allowing it to learn from limited paired data. The model successfully derenders handwritten text in diverse photos and even simple sketches, with human evaluations showing 87% of outputs as valid tracings and 67% resembling human pen trajectories.

By Blagoj Mitrevski, Arina Rak, Julian Schnitzler, Chengkun Li, Andrii Maksai, Jesse Berent, Claudiu Musat
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

Tokenization vs. Augmentation: A Systematic Study of Writer Variance in IMU-Based Online Handwriting Recognition

arXiv:2603. 16883v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inertial measurement unit-based online handwriting recognition enables the recognition of input signals collected across different writing surfaces but remains challenged by uneven character distributions and inter-writer variability.

By Jindong Li, Dario Zanca, Vincent Christlein, Tim Hamann, Jens Barth, Peter K\"ampf, Bj\"orn Eskofier
arXiv AI
Aug 20

OmniHandwritingOCR: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal LLMs in Handwritten OCR Scenarios

OmniHandwritingOCR is a diagnostic benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and OCR systems on handwritten text and mathematical expression recognition. It comprises 77.57K labeled images across six subtasks and twelve subsets, including a difficulty‑stratified multi‑line formula corpus that tests robustness to increasing structural complexity. The benchmark reveals that current systems perform poorly on complex multi‑line formulas, exhibit variable rankings across languages and formula settings, and sometimes hallucinate corrections that are not visually supported.

By Zinuo Guo, Min Zhang, Bo Jiang
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Handwritten Text Recognition Lives in the High-Pixel Variance Subspace

The paper investigates self‑supervised pretraining for Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) and finds that pixel‑reconstruction methods outperform contrastive methods, a contrast to natural‑image classification. The authors argue that discriminative information for HTR is concentrated in high‑variance pixel directions, and they test six SSL methods across six handwriting benchmarks in five languages, showing that pixel‑grounded approaches achieve the lowest character error rates and are more label‑efficient. When combined with a pretrained LLM decoder, a frozen pixel‑grounded encoder rivals fully fine‑tuned supervised baselines, underscoring the importance of aligning representations with high‑variance pixel subspaces.

By Carlos Garrido-Munoz, Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 30

Hybrid Feature Learning for Handwriting Verification

The paper introduces a Hybrid Deep Learning (HDL) architecture that combines Auto-Learned Features (ALF) and Human-Engineered Features (HEF) for handwriting verification. ALF is extracted using a Two Channel Convolutional Neural Network (TC-CNN) or a Two Channel Autoencoder (TC-AE), while HEF is obtained via Gradient Structural Concavity (GSC) or Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT). Experiments on 150,000 pairs of the word "AND" from 1,500 writers show that the HDL model using AE-GSC achieves 99.7% accuracy on a seen writer dataset and 92.16% on a shuffled writer dataset, outperforming CEDAR-FOX, and AE-SIFT performs comparably on unseen writers.

By Seyed Mohammad Abuzar Hashemi, Mihir Chauhan, Jun Chu, Sargur Srihari