arXiv Machine Learning

Explainable GeoAI for urban wildfire structure loss: vegetation and built environment in the 2025 Palisades Fire

The study presents a GeoAI workflow that links 12,081 CAL FIRE damage inspections from the January 2025 Palisades Fire to pre‑fire satellite and GIS data, achieving an ROC‑AUC of 0.92 with cross‑validation but dropping to 0.75 under spatial block validation. Building density within 100 m emerged as the strongest predictor of residential structure loss, while vegetation moisture and greenness had opposing effects at different distances. The findings emphasize the importance of neighborhood‑scale susceptibility screening, moisture‑aware vegetation management, and spatial block validation for urban wildfire modeling.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 16

Multisource Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis of Vineyard Wildfire Impacts and Resilience: The 2019 Kincade Fire

The study analyzes vineyard resilience to the 2019 Kincade Fire in Sonoma County using a comprehensive geospatial framework that includes Sentinel‑2 imagery, weather data, soil and terrain models, and smoke polygons. It finds that vineyard fields experienced lower immediate spectral damage (dNBR) than surrounding wildland vegetation, yet this advantage does not translate into a universal firebreak effect; conditional models reveal a positive association between vineyard fraction and dNBR after accounting for location, terrain, and water use. Additionally, all vineyards were exposed to smoke, a significant portion of road nodes became dead ends, and vineyards inside the fire perimeter showed a slightly larger greenness deficit through 2021, indicating incomplete resilience. whyItMatters":"The findings demonstrate that lower spectral impact does not guarantee full resilience, highlighting the need for nuanced, data‑driven decision support in managing agricultural landscapes during wildfires."

By Parastoo Farajpoor, Mahla Ardebili Pour, Mohammad Bagher Ghiasi, Mohammadreza Narimani
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 23

Annual Earth-observation embeddings encode wildfire disturbance and support simplified burned area mapping

Annual Earth‑observation embeddings, specifically Tessera, can encode wildfire disturbance signals well enough to map burned areas without needing curated fire‑specific imagery or dense time‑series analysis. In tests, linear models using a single Tessera embedding matched or outperformed paired pre‑ and post‑fire HLS imagery and post‑fire imagery alone, achieving high F1 scores for burn‑scar delineation and regional mapping. The approach successfully mapped all same‑year fires in benchmark scenes, recovered 97% of California burned area without California training data, transferred to European fires with high accuracy, and even estimated ignition timing within a 13‑day error margin. "whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates that pre‑trained annual embeddings can simplify and scale burned‑area mapping, reducing reliance on dense time‑series data and enabling more efficient wildfire monitoring."

By Jovana Knezevic, Clement Atzberger, Zhengpeng Feng, Adam F. A. Pellegrini, Srinivasan Keshav, David Coomes
arXiv AI
Sep 30

PyroStack: A Multi-Band Spatio-Temporal Sub-Daily Dataset for Wildfires in the United States

arXiv:2609.36315v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wildfires are an increasing hazard to ecosystems, air quality, and human systems, creating a growing need for datasets that support systematic develo...

By Arya Kondur, Giosue Migliorini, Cameron Schmitt, Francesco Immorlano, Tairan Wang, Rebecca C. Scholten, Efi Foufoula-Georgiou, Gary Johnson, Chris Lautenberger, Valentin Waeselynck, J. Shane Romsos, Kasra Shamsaei, Alejandro Tejedor, Tianjia Liu, Yang Chen, Padhraic Smyth, James T. Randerson
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

WildfireSpreadBench: The Metric Decides the Model in Wildfire Spread Prediction

WildfireSpreadBench evaluates machine‑learning models for predicting next‑day wildfire spread, comparing five discriminative and one generative architecture on the WildfireSpreadTS dataset. The study shows that model rankings differ markedly when using Average Precision versus threshold‑dependent metrics such as F1 and IoU, revealing three distinct prediction profiles—over‑predicting, balanced, and under‑predicting—that AP alone cannot distinguish. Expanding input channels modestly affected AP, underscoring that AP may favor models with predictions poorly suited for operational use.

By Arin Gopakumar, Marco Pannozzo
arXiv AI
Oct 26

Accelerating Wildfire Hazard Mapping Across Canada with an AI Surrogate Modelling Framework

The paper introduces an AI surrogate modelling framework that accelerates wildfire hazard mapping across Canada. By training a multi‑task deep learning model on national‑scale data, the surrogate reproduces key outputs of the computationally intensive BurnP3+ simulator—burn probability, mean fire intensity, and mean rate of spread—in seconds instead of days or weeks. The framework includes standardized training, fine‑tuning, and evaluation protocols, domain‑specific metrics, and counterfactual evaluation to ensure robust out‑of‑distribution performance, achieving up to 806‑fold CPU speed‑up and 13% memory usage compared to the original simulator.

By Hager Radi Abdelwahed, Toluwaleke Olutayo, Chirag Goel, Jana Osea, Aldo Zaimi, Tom Swystun, Sandy Erni, Francisco Emiliano Lopez Saavedra, Yan Boulanger, Ga\'etan Marceau Caron
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

Modular Deep Learning Mechanisms for Auditable Next-Day Wildfire Spread Prediction

The paper presents modular deep learning augmentations for next‑day wildfire spread prediction, including wind‑ and slope‑conditioned attention biases, physics‑feature retrieval‑augmented output correction, and fire‑conditioned dual‑stream gating. These modules are evaluated on five backbone models using the Next Day Wildfire Spread benchmark, with staged ablations, directional audits, retrieval perturbations, calibration measures, and computational comparisons. The best augmented SwinUNETR model achieves an F1 score of 0.4216 and an AUC‑PR of 0.3673, while a mixed ensemble reaches 0.4292 and 0.3790, demonstrating that predictive performance, operational trustworthiness, and computational practicality can be simultaneously improved.

By Miguel Esparza, Aydin Ayanzadeh Ahmad Mousavi, Ali Mostafavi
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 7

Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Post-Wildfire Debris-Flow Prediction

arXiv:2608. 05265v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prediction of post-wildfire debris flows is critical for mitigating hazards to communities, infrastructure, and resources during intense rainfall in recently burned areas.

By Quinn Ledingham, Zhengsen Xu, Yimin Zhu, Zack Dewis, Mabel Heffring, Saeid Taleghanidoozdoozan, Motasem Alkayid, Megan Greenwood, Lincoln Linlin Xu