OpenAI Blog

Better exploration with parameter noise

We’ve found that adding adaptive noise to the parameters of reinforcement learning algorithms frequently boosts performance. This exploration method is simple to implement and very rarely decreases performance, so it’s worth trying on any problem.

arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

Gradient-Momentum Coupling: A Parameter-Space Proxy for Learning Progress

The paper introduces Gradient‑Momentum Coupling (GMC), a method that quantifies learning progress by measuring how strongly a sample influences changes in the parameter space, using the normalized absolute product of its gradient and the momentum of previous gradients. GMC filters out noise by accumulating consistent directions of change while canceling random fluctuations, leading to a more uniform prioritization across tasks with varying noise levels and better ranking of learnable tasks by improvement speed. Experiments on MiniGrid MultiRoom tasks show that replacing prediction error with GMC in the Intrinsic Curiosity Module restores exploration capabilities that were lost to unpredictable observations.

By Samuel Blad, Martin L\"angkvist, Amy Loutfi
arXiv AI
Jun 6

Retry Policy Gradients in Continuous Action Spaces

arXiv:2606. 05888v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retry-based objectives such as pass@K and max@K optimize the best return obtained from multiple sampled trajectories, and recent work has shown that they can promote exploration without explicit exploration bonuses.

By Soichiro Nishimori, Paavo Parmas
arXiv AI
Jul 15

Tracking Drift: Variation-Aware Entropy Scheduling for Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2601. 19624v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Real-world reinforcement learning often faces environment drift, but most existing methods rely on static entropy coefficients/target entropy, causing over-exploration during stable periods and under-exploration after drift, and leaving unanswered the principled question of how exploration intensity should scale with drift magnitude.

By Tongxi Wang, Zhuoyang Xia, Xinran Chen, Shan Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

When Do Intrinsic Rewards Lead to Exploration?

The paper investigates when intrinsic rewards effectively drive exploration in reinforcement learning. It introduces a formal criterion that evaluates policies based on the counterfactual information they acquire, comparing how well their histories can replace experience from alternative policies. Using a simple environment, the authors show that common intrinsic reward objectives—count-based, prediction-error, empowerment, and information-gain—can lead to Pareto-suboptimal exploration under this criterion, and they propose conditions and a new objective that better align with optimal exploration.

By Scott W. Viteri (Stanford University), Laura Gomezjurado Gonzalez (Stanford University), Clark Barrett (Stanford University)