arXiv AI By Gavin B. Rens

Adaptive Mixing of Policies from Searching and Policies from Learning

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 15700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Background: Distillation of training targets generated thru search/planning has proven useful in reinforcement learning, but search can take exceedingly long.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Is Monte Carlo Tree Search Just Every-Visit Monte Carlo Control?

The article argues that Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and every‑visit Monte Carlo (MC) control are essentially the same method, differing only in terminology and presentation. It shows that MCTS’s four stages—selection, expansion, simulation, and backup—can be reduced to two core operations: sampling trajectories under the current policy and performing every‑visit MC updates. The note aims to make this equivalence explicit and easier to recognize.

By Xianyi Wu
arXiv AI
Aug 14

Exploiting Symbolic Heuristics for the Synthesis of Domain-Specific Temporal Planning Guidance using Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2505. 13372v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent work investigated the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the synthesis of heuristic guidance to improve the performance of temporal planners when a domain is fixed and a set of training problems (not plans) is given.

By Irene Brugnara, Alessandro Valentini, Andrea Micheli
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 20

Reinforced Planning with Latent World Models

Reinforced Planning with Latent World Models (RP1) is a novel method that learns to evaluate imagined outcomes via a critic and to improve multi‑step plans through an optimizer trained offline on world‑model roll‑outs. It is the first approach to fully learn plan improvement and can be attached to any pretrained latent world model. In experiments on visual navigation, arm reaching, and robotic manipulation, RP1 outperforms hand‑designed search algorithms, achieving near‑perfect success while using far fewer roll‑outs and running up to 67× faster than the strongest alternative.

By Armin Sommer, Jannik Schilling