arXiv:2608.22872v2 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speech-based applications pass spoken queries through automatic speech recognition (ASR) before any retrieval module, so ASR errors enter the pipeline...
arXiv:2602. 12783v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Spoken query retrieval is an important interaction mode in modern information retrieval.
The paper introduces LAnR (Latent Abstraction for Retrieval-Augmented Generation), a unified framework where a single large language model jointly encodes, retrieves, and generates within its latent space. Instead of generating natural language queries, LAnR produces dense retrieval vectors from a designated [PRED] token and matches them against encoded document representations from the same model. An adaptive MLP control head decides when sufficient evidence has been retrieved, eliminating the need for a separate retriever and explicit token-level stopping reasoning. Experiments on six QA benchmarks show that LAnR outperforms existing RAG methods while improving inference efficiency by reducing retrieval calls and tightening model integration.
The paper introduces a three‑stage pipeline to improve accented conversational ASR for speakers from India, Indonesia, and Latin America. It uses heuristic SQL filters to curate entity‑rich training data, regional LoRA adapters fine‑tuned on Qwen2.5‑Omni‑3B to generate both verbatim and corrected transcripts, and a six‑category error taxonomy validated by an LLM judge. The approach raises entity recall to 80‑85% and filler recall to 76‑86%, while keeping WER low (6‑10%) and outperforming Whisper and a commercial ASR on entity recall.
arXiv:2412. 15529v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) synergizes the retrieval of pertinent data with the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), ensuring that the generated output is not only contextually relevant but also accurate and current.
The paper introduces GUIDE, a generative unsupervised framework for Chinese query correction that uses shared-ID encoding for phonetically or visually confusable characters and an encoder–decoder architecture to reconstruct queries within plausible confusion neighborhoods. It incorporates a time‑decayed, query‑frequency‑weighted objective to adapt to rapidly changing query vocabularies. Experiments on QSpell 250K and the large‑scale KwaiSearch dataset demonstrate that GUIDE consistently outperforms strong baselines, with online A/B testing confirming improvements in correction quality and downstream engagement.
arXiv:2608.28916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems are commonly evaluated with word error rate (WER), yet many voice workflows depend on exact written values f...
The paper introduces a unified phoneme‑based TTS‑to‑ASR augmentation pipeline that uses a multilingual TTS model with language‑ID conditioning and incorporates grapheme‑to‑phoneme conversion, reference‑speech filtering, and candidate‑text selection. It proposes phoneme‑frequency‑guided selection (PFGS) to rank sentences based on phoneme frequencies from real ASR labels, and demonstrates that random augmentation and PFGS both improve ASR performance across Arabic, French, Italian, and Portuguese test sets, with PFGS yielding up to a 19.3% relative WER reduction. The study also shows that filtering reference speech can further lower WER by up to 0.59 points on certain datasets.
The paper introduces a compact BART-based sequence‑to‑sequence model for low‑latency spell correction of Japanese music search queries, addressing challenges posed by four writing scripts. It employs a script‑aware synthetic misspelling pipeline that blends keyboard‑layout models, phonetic confusion priors, consonant alternations, and kana case errors, and normalizes mixed‑script titles to a single canonical script to reduce hallucinations. Experiments show the model achieves 41.09% exact‑match accuracy and 11.62% CER, outperforming edit‑distance baselines while keeping inference latency under 4 ms on a single GPU.
arXiv:2609.22100v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves language models with retrieved evidence, but processing many long passages is costly and can introduce...
The paper evaluates how robust large language models (LLMs) are when using retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) in practical settings. It investigates whether RAG always outperforms non‑RAG approaches, whether adding more retrieved documents helps, and whether the order of documents matters, using a benchmark of 1,891 samples across five datasets and three task categories. Experiments with 11 LLMs show generally high retrieval robustness, but performance varies by task and prompting strategy, indicating that adopting RAG should be considered on a case‑by‑case basis.
arXiv:2609.13602v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Voice agents often need to collect names, addresses, identifiers, dates, and times exactly, yet end-to-end benchmarks obscure where capture fails. We i...