arXiv AI

Time-Series Forecasting in Safety-Critical Environments: An Open-Source Package for EU-AI-Act-Compliant Development / Zeitreihenprognose in sicherheitskritischen Umgebungen: Ein Open-Source-Paket f\"ur die KI-VO-konforme Entwicklung

arXiv:2604. 23859v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With spotforecast2-safe we present an integrated Compliance-by-Design approach to Python-based point forecasting of time series in safety-critical environments.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 27

Industrial Tokenization for LLM-Based Health Intelligence: A Federated Architecture for Industrial Evidence Integration

arXiv:2607. 22153v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Industrial health management increasingly relies on heterogeneous information sources, including condition monitoring systems, supervisory control and data acquisition systems, maintenance records, inspection results, and prognostic models.

By Deshui Li, Xiao-Ming Yuan, Zishun Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 11

UGAF-ITS: A Standards Harmonization Framework and Validation Tool for Multi-Framework AI Governance in Distributed Intelligent Transportation Systems

arXiv:2604. 22789v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Organizations deploying AI-enabled Intelligent Transportation Systems face fragmented governance: ISO/IEC~42001 demands a certifiable management system, the EU AI Act imposes binding high-risk obligations from August~2026, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework structures voluntary practice.

By Talal Ashraf Butt, Muhammad Iqbal, Razi Iqbal
arXiv AI
Sep 15

From Legal Text to AI-specific Risk Sources: A Systematic Analysis of the EU AI Act's High-Risk Requirements

The paper systematically classifies the EU AI Act’s high‑risk requirements, finding that only a minority directly address AI‑specific risk sources while most impose organizational and documentation obligations. From these risk‑related requirements, the authors derive a consolidated list of distinct AI‑specific risk sources, creating an EU AI Act Risk Source List. This list aims to bridge the gap between legal obligations and AI risk‑management practice by providing a structured reference for comparing the Act’s implicit risk coverage with existing AI risk taxonomies.

By Ronald Schnitzer, Mike Auer, Rumpa Choudhury, Andreas Hapfelmeier, Maximilian Hoeving, Isabelle Painter, Josiane Xavier Parreira, Sonja Zillner