The paper introduces DNA, a system that enhances decentralized contact tracing by combining statistical inference with a differentially private neural network. By ensuring the neural augmentation satisfies differential privacy, the method improves detection of potentially infected individuals even at a privacy budget of epsilon=1 per message. Simulation results suggest that this approach can reduce infection rates through more targeted testing.
By Rob Romijnders, Christos Louizos, Yuki M. Asano, Max Welling
arXiv:2608.29251v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Privacy protection for live web traffic requires more than detecting private spans. Agent-based privacy protection systems must determine whether an ou...
By Ruiyi Yang, Gayathri Lihinikaduarachchi, Rahat Masood, Flora D. Salim, Salil S. Kanhere
arXiv:2606. 17035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prior research suggests that differential privacy (DP) inherently enhances the robustness of federated learning (FL) against backdoor attacks.
By Xiaolin Li, Ning Wang, Ninghui Li, Wenhai Sun
arXiv:2303. 07152v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Achieving optimal statistical performance while ensuring the privacy of personal data is a challenging yet crucial objective in modern data analysis.
By T. Tony Cai, Yichen Wang, Linjun Zhang
The paper introduces a lightweight screening tool that evaluates individual patient vulnerability to membership inference attacks across thousands of medical AI models. By measuring attack scores for each patient, the authors found that certain records consistently rank high in risk regardless of training settings, and that stronger weight decay can reduce overall exposure but not the identity of the most at‑risk patients. The tool uses four small models to flag high‑risk patients before a production model is trained, aiming to integrate privacy assessment into clinical AI data preparation.
By Konstantinos Vrettos, Eleftherios Tzanis, Haridimos Kondylakis, Evangelia E. Vassalou, Florence X. Doo, Michail E. Klontzas
arXiv:2608.28934v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) has traditionally been used to provide theoretical upper bounds on an algorithm's stability to changing its training data. In...
By Saloni Modi, Srivi Balaji, Yusong Zhu, Gautam Kamath, Kevin Tian
The paper introduces IBIS, a framework for designing canaries that are efficient for one‑run privacy auditing. IBIS optimizes each canary’s membership inference attack score while minimizing interference among canaries by encouraging orthogonality in embedding space. The method uses influence‑based greedy initialization and a bilevel optimization algorithm that updates a single model incrementally, achieving better performance‑cost trade‑offs and reducing computational cost by up to two orders of magnitude compared to existing approaches.
By Mathieu Dagr\'eou, Valentin Dorseuil, Mohammad Yaghini, Nicolas Papernot, Aur\'elien Bellet
arXiv:2606. 12733v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Privacy auditing provides an important safeguard by estimating the actual information leaked by a model, thus ensuring that theoretical privacy guarantees hold in practice.
By Adya Agrawal, Yu Wei, Jaspal Singh, Malik Magdon-Ismail, Vassilis Zikas
Aegis is a client‑side defense for medical federated learning that protects against model inversion attacks by adding a masking gradient derived from locally synthesized data. The method exploits the fact that attacks fail when the effective batch size exceeds the model’s leakage capacity, turning this bottleneck into a privacy guarantee. Experiments on MNIST, CIFAR‑10, and MedMNIST datasets show that Aegis neutralizes state‑of‑the‑art attacks while preserving model accuracy and adding only modest overhead.
By Chaoyu Zhang, Shanghao Shi, Heng Jin, Ning Wang, Y. Thomas Hou, Wenjing Lou
arXiv:2606. 20546v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) ensures rigorous individual-level privacy guarantees against even the most knowledgeable attackers, but its worst-case nature can impose a costly privacy-accuracy tradeoff.
By Linda Lu, Karthik Sridharan
arXiv:2410. 06814v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Over-parameterized models are typically vulnerable to membership inference attacks, which aim to determine whether a specific sample is included in the training of a given model.
By Hengxiang Zhang, Qiang Hu, Hongxin Wei
arXiv:2307. 13127v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data used to train predictive models via empirical risk minimization (ERM) often contain sensitive personal information.
By Spencer Giddens, Yiwang Zhou, Kevin R. Krull, Tara M. Brinkman, Peter X. K. Song, Fang Liu