arXiv:2610.34204v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In applications such as air-quality monitoring, inexpensive sensor readings can help predict pollutant concentrations measured by a separate referenc...
arXiv:2508. 13362v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Conformal prediction (CP) is well-suited for uncertainty quantification in time series forecasting due to its distribution-free coverage guarantees.
Conformal Calibration Transfer addresses the challenge of applying conformal prediction when labeled calibration data is only available in a source space, while predictions are needed in a target space linked via unlabeled paired observations. The proposed Transported Conformal Calibration (TCC) method transports source calibration into the target domain and then corrects residual mismatches using only unlabeled target inputs, with two variants: TCC‑KS, which conservatively adjusts calibration based on a label‑free uncertainty surrogate, and weighted‑TCC, which reweights transported calibration for efficiency when weights are stable. Finite‑sample target‑domain coverage guarantees are provided, and experiments on CIFAR‑100‑C, Tiny‑ImageNet‑C, and SEN12MS demonstrate reliable coverage transfer without labeled target data, along with label‑free diagnostics to signal when correction is required.
arXiv:2606. 31915v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While conformal prediction provides a general framework for uncertainty quantification in predictive inference, its application is often limited by computational cost.
arXiv:2608. 06206v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conformal prediction endows arbitrary black-box predictors with finite-sample, distribution-free marginal coverage, yet marginal validity can hide severe covariate-specific miscalibration, while exact distribution-free conditional coverage is finite-sample unattainable.
arXiv:2609.17091v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-target regression requires a model to simultaneously predict several related outputs. Conformal prediction provides distribution-free, finite-sam...
arXiv:2607. 16675v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A point prediction that is well calibrated on average can still be systematically biased conditional on its own value, undermining its use in downstream decision-making.
arXiv:2603. 01719v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In regression, conformal prediction often suffers from inefficiency under heteroscedasticity and skewness due to fixed, non-adaptive interval centering.
arXiv:2601. 21455v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conformal prediction(CP) has become a cornerstone of distribution-free uncertainty quantification, conventionally evaluated by its coverage and interval length.
arXiv:2607. 10008v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce a new conformal prediction method that constructs calibrated prediction sets over collections of spatial events, such as tropical cyclone genesis and earthquake locations.
The paper introduces Multi-Variable Conformal Prediction (MCP), a framework that jointly optimizes and calibrates multiple prediction‑set parameters in a single optimization problem, thereby eliminating the need for a calibration data split while preserving finite‑sample coverage guarantees. Two tractable variants are proposed: RemMCP, which uses constrained optimization with constraint removal and generalizes split conformal prediction, and RelMCP, which employs penalized optimization with constraint relaxation and can handle non‑convex problems. Experiments on ellipsoidal and multi‑modal prediction sets show that both RemMCP and an adaptive version of RelMCP consistently achieve target coverage with lower variance across calibration runs and, in most cases, produce smaller or comparable prediction sets compared to baseline methods.
arXiv:2607. 11470v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable uncertainty quantification is essential for integrating solar and wind generation into modern power systems, where operators must weigh risk rather than act on point forecasts alone.