arXiv:2604. 01562v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Voice cloning is often evaluated in terms of overall quality, but less is known about accent preservation and its perceptual consequences.
By Tianle Yang, Chengzhe Sun, Phil Rose, Siwei Lyu
The paper demonstrates that the multilingual voice cloning model XTTSv2 can be repurposed for speaker anonymization without retraining. By conditioning on a pseudo-speaker and using an iterative refinement strategy, the authors balance privacy and intelligibility, achieving near‑optimal privacy (EER ≈ 0.49) and competitive speech quality across seven European languages. The method outperforms dedicated anonymization baselines and requires no language‑specific training.
By Romolo Muletta, Felix Matthias Saaro, Mark Cieliebak, Jan Deriu
arXiv:2610.18669v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Recent advances in zero-shot voice cloning systems make it possible to reproduce a recognizable voice from a short recording and attach it to arbitra...
By Johanna Magdalena Kuch, Maud van Lier, Daksitha Senel Withanage Don, Patrick Gebhard, Tanja Schneeberger, Elisabeth Andr\'e
arXiv:2608. 19527v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI clones that imitate a specific person typically reproduce what the person says and how they sound, but not how they listen.
By Koji Inoue, Kazushi Kato, Tatsuya Kawahara, Shunichi Kasahara
The article critiques the notion that a person's voice is a stable, unique biometric trace—termed a voiceprint—by reviewing historical, forensic, and technological evidence. It argues that voices are highly dynamic and context-dependent, and that the voiceprint metaphor misrepresents probabilistic speaker information as a fixed identity marker. The authors emphasize that speaker recognition should account for within-speaker variability, domain mismatch, and synthetic manipulation rather than rely on an assumed stable voiceprint.
By Tianle Yang, Cuiling Zhang, Chengzhe Sun, Siwei Lyu, Phil Rose
arXiv:2609.35952v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We introduce HEAR (Human-recorded Evaluation of Audio-LLM bias by Real speakers), a large-scale, ecologically valid benchmark comprising 87k real hum...
By Shen Yan, Duc Le, Irina-Elena Veliche
arXiv:2607. 03985v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advanced neural technologies in speech synthesis and voice conversion (VC) have introduced severe risks to personal privacy, necessitating robust Speaker Anonymization Systems (SAS).
By Meiying Melissa Chen, Anastasia Kuznetsova, Zhenyu Wang, Zhiyao Duan
arXiv:2607. 22304v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Synthetic data augmentation in speech is common practice for linguistic tasks like ASR, but has seen far less work for paralinguistic ones, especially clinical tasks where labelled data is expensive and some patient groups are underrepresented.
By Roseline Polle, Owen Parsons, George Fairs, Luis Miguel San Martin Fernandez, Cole Looney, Xiaoliang Wu, Alexandra Livia Georgescu, Stefano Goria
arXiv:2610.17019v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Whisper-style ASR models provide strong zero-shot transcription, but their residual errors are not evenly distributed across datasets, recording condit...
By Sergei Katkov, Antonio Liotta
The paper introduces GUARD, a lightweight speaker identity unlearning framework designed to prevent re-identification in zero-shot text-to-speech systems. GUARD employs a learned speaker gate and speaker-agnostic activation steering on a frozen TTS backbone, optimizing steering vectors through group-relative reward optimization to reduce similarity to forgotten speakers while maintaining intelligibility and naturalness. Experiments on CosyVoice2 show that GUARD significantly lowers forget-speaker similarity and re-identification accuracy while preserving the ability to reproduce retained speakers.
By Hyoeun Kim, Yujun Lee, Kyuhong Shim
Synthetic data augmentation in speech is common practice for linguistic tasks like ASR, but has seen far less work for paralinguistic ones, especially clinical tasks where labelled data is expensive and some patient groups are underrepresented. Voice cloning is one such augmentation approach, but is typically evaluated on speech intelligibility (WER) or speaker similarity (SS) rather than on downstream performance, and it remains unclear whether these preserve the paralinguistic signal such tasks depend on.
arXiv:2608. 15411v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) models to generate highly realistic human voices has advanced rapidly.
By Chengzhe Sun, Tianle Yang, Siwei Lyu