arXiv:2607. 00491v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmarks for vision-language models (VLMs) mostly test observational spatial reasoning: models describe relations already visible in the input.
By Leyuan Yu, Xiao Tang, Minghao Liu, Xinyuan Li, Xiaokai Bai, Sheng Zhou, Qunshu Lin, Weihao Xuan, Naoto Yokoya
arXiv:2608. 08021v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) should answer from concrete image evidence rather than language priors, dataset shortcuts, or irrelevant visual context.
By Haojie Huang, Xinlei Yu, Chengming Xu, Zhangquan Chen, Cheng Yang, Qingdong He, Yu Yang, Jiangning Zhang, Xiaobin Hu
arXiv:2609.32352v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown increasing potential for medical image understanding, yet their capabilities in ophthalmic imaging r...
By Gujie Shao, Zixun Xie, Xuechun Xing, Ruixiang Wang, Ziyun Lan, Yanlin Qi, Gangyi Zhang, Yuxin Yang, Dawei Li, Haiming Tang
The paper introduces Rendering-Free Lookahead (RFL), a method for active robot vision that selects camera motions to reveal information needed for viewpoint-dependent question answering. RFL predicts future answerability—how well a view can answer a question—using a student model trained via distillation from a privileged teacher that renders future views with 3D Gaussian Splatting. In deployment, RFL chooses camera motions without rendering, achieving a 43% improvement in mean judge score over a baseline on 377 unseen test episodes.
By Koya Sakamoto, Daichi Azuma, Shuhei Kurita, Naoya Chiba, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo, Taiki Miyanishi
arXiv:2609.35823v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have made substantial progress in autonomous driving, but their success has primarily been studied in ego-centric scenes....
By Kang Yang, Shuai Liu, Hang Li, Yance Fang, Deying Li, Yongcai Wang
arXiv:2601. 19099v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision--language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on many multimodal benchmarks but remain brittle on spatial reasoning tasks that require aligning abstract overhead representations with egocentric views.
By Yosub Shin, Michael Buriek, Igor Molybog
The paper introduces TerraAgent, a training‑free framework that enhances remote sensing visual question answering by integrating three modules: GDR for demonstration retrieval, MACE for evidence‑typed sub‑question decomposition, and CVA for counterfactual evidence auditing. It demonstrates significant improvements on multiple benchmarks, raising accuracy, visual‑dependency scores, and reducing prior‑only answers and hallucinations without fine‑tuning.
By Jingwen Huang, Yiming Fang, Hanxiao Wu, Boyuan He, Keyi Luo
arXiv:2610.19564v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A spatial answer depends on the reference frame specified in language and its supporting visual evidence. Item accuracy alone obscures whether correctn...
By Chunxi Luo, Qishuai Ding, Xingchen Peng, Hengwei Ye, Ke Zhang, Wenxin Lian, Tianyi Lu, Chunlong Yu, Zhenya Lin
StateSight is a new benchmark designed to isolate and evaluate the ability of vision‑language models to reconstruct latent spatial structure from a single image. It consists of three procedurally generated task families—cube‑net opposite‑face reasoning, occluded cube‑tower counting, and 4‑neighbor connected‑component counting—each with 300 deterministic prompts and exact‑match scoring. The benchmark also includes a companion dataset, StateSight‑Steps, with 900 image‑text examples and 3,600 intermediate visual states to aid analysis of reconstruction errors.
By Michelle Lin
arXiv:2606. 00616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) struggle with grounded reasoning, temporal consistency, and context aware planning in videos.
By Shivam Singh, Saptarshi Majumdar, Pratik Prabhanjan, Zicheng Liu, Emad Barsoum
arXiv:2608. 16480v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present RISE (Roadside Infrastructure Sequence Understanding and Evaluation), a framework spanning metric 3D tracking and structured vision-language reasoning in roadside sequences.
By Yanbo Jiang, Haotian Zheng, Jiahao Wang, Hanxiao Ren, Yitao Xu, Yining Xing, Zehong Ke, Hao Cheng, Yiqian Tu, Jinhao Li, Zhiyuan Xuan, Fang Zhang, Jianqiang Wang
The paper introduces PanoVideoBench, a manually annotated benchmark with 1,000 questions covering five categories and 15 question types for panoramic video understanding, and identifies cross‑view tracking and sphere‑time evidence integration as weak points in existing models. To address these gaps, the authors create PanoVideoCoT, a dataset of 13,465 QA‑CoT pairs generated via sphere‑time‑grounded synthesis, and train PanoVideoReasoner using panoramic CoT fine‑tuning and evidence‑privileged on‑policy self‑distillation. The resulting model achieves 55.7% accuracy on PanoVideoBench, improving the baseline by 12.5 points and surpassing the previous state‑of‑the‑art by 2.6 points, particularly in spatial, cross‑view, and temporal reasoning.
By Lidong Lu, Lidong Zou, Xinyi Mao, Jiaxin Lv, Zhenquan Li, Liangrui Dong, Tong Lu, Guo Chen