arXiv AI

Onnes: A Physics-Grounded Multi-Agent LLM Simulator for Cryogenic Fault Diagnosis in Quantum Computing Infrastructure

arXiv:2607. 05805v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dilution refrigerators are the enabling infrastructure of superconducting quantum computers, yet their fault diagnosis is still dominated by threshold alarms that report that something is wrong, not what.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

Real-Time Detection and Repair of LLM Agent Failures

arXiv:2608. 02464v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents fail mid-episode -- they loop, cascade tool errors, drift off goal, fabricate results, or silently absorb corrupted content -- and the standard remedy, judging every step with a second LLM, costs more than the agent itself.

By Sunny Dubey
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

From IceCube to IT-Sphere: A Hybrid Quantum-Classical GNN for Banking IT Root Cause Analysis

The paper introduces Hybrid Quantum Root Cause Analysis (HQ‑RCA), a workflow that applies a hybrid Quantum Graph Neural Network (QGNN) to banking IT operations. HQ‑RCA replaces the classification head of the classical DynEdge GNN with a Variational Quantum Circuit, achieving comparable F1 performance to the strongest classical baseline while simplifying the quantum readout to a single Pauli‑Z expectation. Experiments on 13 k anonymised alarm clusters from a major European bank demonstrate that the quantum component can be executed on NISQ hardware without error mitigation, using a gradient‑free grid scan for optimisation.

By Antonio Greco, Riccardo Paoletti, Roberto Cappuccio, Mario Onorato
arXiv AI
Aug 18

When Agentic Executions Fail: Detecting and Localizing Runtime Faults from Telemetry

arXiv:2608. 14680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliability in LLM-based agentic systems is a property of the whole execution (its tool calls, model calls, guardrails, and inter-agent messages), not of the final answer alone, yet evaluating only task outcomes reveals little about how or why a run fails.

By Chenkai Zhang, Yiran Li, Yifang Tian, Michalis Bachras, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Reverse N-Wise Output-Oriented Testing for AI/ML and Quantum Computing Systems

The paper proposes reverse n‑wise output‑oriented testing for AI/ML and quantum computing systems, a method that builds covering arrays over output equivalence classes, confidence buckets, decision boundaries, fairness partitions, embedding clusters, ranking stability bands, quantum measurement distributions, and error syndrome patterns. It then uses gradient‑free metaheuristic optimization to solve the inverse mapping problem, generating input configurations or quantum circuit parameters that trigger specific behavioral signatures in opaque models. The framework claims to provide explicit coverage guarantees, higher fault detection rates for calibration, boundary, and error syndromes, improved test suite efficiency, and automated partition discovery for MLOps and quantum validation pipelines.

By Lamine Rihani
arXiv AI
Sep 17

BadQubits: An LLM-Based Framework for Static Pre-Execution Detection of Structurally Harmful Quantum Circuits

BadQubits is an LLM-based framework that statically analyzes OpenQASM 2.0 circuits before execution to detect structurally harmful patterns. The system evaluates four large language model architectures on 1,500 circuits, achieving 92.67% classification accuracy and 96.1% recall for harmful circuits with a fine‑tuned Qwen Coder 2.5 7B model. Comparative experiments show that LLMs retain sequential token structure, outperforming a bag‑of‑gates CNN, and that model decisions correlate with threat‑defining features such as SWAP density and measurement timing.

By Justin Woodring, Lamine Noureddine, Aisha Ali-Gombe
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

QEMScore: How Much Does the Measurement Add to Learned Quantum Error Mitigation?

The paper introduces QEMScore, a metric that compares learned quantum error mitigators to capacity‑matched controls that do not use measurement data. Using simulated circuits with exact ideal answers, the study finds that many mitigators gain little from measurement inputs, with a plain polynomial model often outperforming them. On real hardware data, however, measurement inputs can provide predictive benefits, highlighting that performance depends on representation and protocol specifics.

By Yue Zhao, Huayue Gu, Yushun Dong, Xiyang Hu