arXiv Machine Learning

Evaluating Pretrained Music Embeddings for Cross-Performance Jazz Standard Recognition

arXiv:2607. 00777v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recognizing jazz standards from audio is a challenging form of tune-level music retrieval: different performances of the same standard may vary in tempo, key, arrangement, instrumentation, improvisational content, and even whether the head melody is present.

arXiv AI
Sep 16

MUUNRiver-Bench: Diagnosing Relation-Dependent Music Retrieval with Multimodal Instructions

MUUNRiver-Bench is a diagnostic benchmark for music retrieval that uses natural‑language instructions to define relevance for reference‑audio queries. It contains 3,440 tracks across 13 genres and 116 sub‑genres and covers seven tasks such as similar‑music, style‑preserving lyric‑rewriting, cover, and segment retrieval. Experiments with six models in eight configurations show that acoustic encoders favor local identity while text‑aligned encoders favor semantic relations, and that instruction‑aware and audio‑text fusion systems do not consistently outperform their backbones.

By Zhancheng Guo, Congren Dai, Shangda Wu, Jianhuai Hu, Danni Zhao, Xiaobing Li, Maosong Sun
arXiv AI
Jun 8

FIGMA: Towards FIne-Grained Music retrievAl

arXiv:2606. 06615v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieving music using natural language descriptions has improved with contrastive audio-text models such as CLAP, but current systems remain limited to coarse semantic queries.

By Nishit Anand, Ashish Seth, Sreyan Ghosh, Dinesh Manocha, Ramani Duraiswami
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

Instrument Classification of Solo Sheet Music Images

This paper investigates instrument classification using solo sheet music images rather than audio. It converts images into sequences of musical words via bootleg score representation and treats the task as text classification, training AWD‑LSTM, GPT‑2, and RoBERTa models on IMSLP data for eight instruments. Pretraining on unlabeled data and fine‑tuning improves RoBERTa’s accuracy from 34.5% to 42.9%, and two proposed data‑augmentation methods raise accuracy by an additional 15%.

By Kevin Ji, Daniel Yang, TJ Tsai