arXiv:2609.14829v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We introduce Enemray, a Hassaniya-centric language model that enables general-purpose interaction in Hassaniya. Enemray is trained around a stability...
By Cheikh Ahmed
arXiv:2605.14322v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Language agents are increasingly deployed in professional workflows, yet tutoring remains a high-stakes capability that existing evaluations only p...
By Zixin Chen, Peng Liu, Rui Sheng, Haobo Li, Jianhong Tu, Xiaodong Deng, Kashun Shum, Dayiheng Liu, Huamin Qu
Bangla-English tutoring requires more than producing a correct translation: learners also need explanations of grammar differences, awareness of their likely errors, and targeted practice. We present...
arXiv:2601.02933v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Human evaluation is the gold standard for multilingual NLP, but is often skipped in practice and substituted with automatic metrics because it is n...
By Vil\'em Zouhar, Tom Kocmi
arXiv:2604. 07341v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Most repository-level code translation and validation techniques have been evaluated on a single source-target programming language (PL) pair, owing to the complex engineering effort required to adapt new PL pairs.
By Ali Reza Ibrahimzada, Brandon Paulsen, Daniel Kroening, Reyhaneh Jabbarvand
The paper introduces CourseChat, an on‑premises, multi‑course retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) tutor designed for undergraduate business education. It runs behind a campus web gateway, with each of six courses identified by a unique course reference number (CRN) sharing dual AI hosts that provide a FastAPI service, a local vector database, and a local large language model (LLM) served by Ollama. The authors evaluate different model sizes, noting that larger models failed speed requirements while a 12B and 7B model met the classroom speed gate; a mixture‑of‑experts variant improved some corrections but introduced new errors, leading them to retain an 8B model for production pending further improvement. The study highlights that model selection, evidence sourcing, serving compatibility, and product design must be considered together, though it does not demonstrate learning gains and calls for separate evaluation of faculty ratings, peak‑load capacity, and public‑gateway acceptance.
By Sidney Shapiro, Joshua Lindemann
arXiv:2609.14726v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to scale codebook-based annotation in scientific research, but existing workflows provide limited support...
By Boqin Yuan, Xiaoyi Gu, Fiona Li, Chang Wan, Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang, Jieyu Zhao
arXiv:2608. 03952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to provide conversational practice for English-as-a-second-language (ESL) learners.
By Dongjie Yang, Siyan Lin, Leixian Shen, Rui Sheng, Huamin Qu, Zixin Chen
arXiv:2507. 03162v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed various domains, particularly computer science (CS) education.
By Adrian Marius Dumitran, Theodor-Pierre Moroianu, Mihnea-Vicentiu Buca
arXiv:2011.03783v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: In this work, we introduce the construction of a machine translation (MT) assisted and human-in-the-loop multilingual parallel corpus with an...
By Lifeng Han, Najet Hadj Mohamed, Malak Rassem, Gareth Jones, Alan Smeaton, Goran Nenadic
The paper introduces a three‑layer checklist-and-judge framework to evaluate interpreter agents that mediate live conversation across languages. It assesses semantic, pragmatic, and cultural‑social dimensions—naturalness, intent, and social appropriateness—rather than just fidelity, in both single‑turn and multi‑turn settings. Extensive validation shows that conventional MT metrics miss failures in stronger interpreters, and that context, structured instructions, and cultural cues influence communicative success.
By Faiz Ghifari Haznitrama, Alice Oh
Exposía is the first public dataset linking academic writing and feedback in higher education, comprising student research project proposals, peer and instructor comments, and free-text reviews collected from a Computer Science course. It includes human assessment scores based on a fine‑grained, pedagogically‑grounded schema for both writing and feedback. The dataset is used to benchmark large language models on automated scoring of proposals and student reviews, revealing that different LLMs excel at each task and that closed‑source models outperform open‑weight ones, while a multi‑aspect prompting strategy proves most effective for classroom deployment.
By Dennis Zyska, Alla Rozovskaya, Ilia Kuznetsov, Iryna Gurevych