arXiv:2606. 29601v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current languages for specifying multiagent protocols either over-constrain protocol enactments or complicate capturing their meanings.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 14790v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems increasingly coordinate planning, reasoning, tool use, and human interaction, yet their reliability remains limited.
arXiv:2606. 05043v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The last few years have witnessed major advances in the modeling and implementation of multiagent systems based on declarative interaction protocols.
arXiv:2604. 17612v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are difficult to reason about.
arXiv:2606. 19135v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) advance and multi-agent systems aim to overcome the limits of standalone agents, robust communication protocols are becoming essential infrastructure for distributed agent networks.
arXiv:2606. 09751v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models are moving from response generation into operational roles.
The paper introduces control‑data flow separation to improve prompt optimization in multi‑agent large language model systems. By representing execution protocols as typed, validated program objects and keeping task‑relevant content as unstructured language, the method prevents prompt edits from corrupting critical routing, formatting, or termination signals. Experiments on synthetic reasoning, collaborative review generation, and insurance rating workflows show that this approach maintains 100% protocol validity while consistently enhancing task performance.