arXiv Machine Learning

Native Geometry vs. Linear Recoverability: How Alignment Changes Platonic Scaling

arXiv AI
Jul 7

Multi-Way Representation Alignment

arXiv:2602. 06205v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Platonic Representation Hypothesis suggests that independently trained neural networks converge to increasingly similar latent spaces.

By Akshit Achara, Tatiana Gaintseva, Mateo Mahaut, Pritish Chakraborty, Viktor Stenby Johansson, Melih Barsbey, Emanuele Rodol\`a, Donato Crisostomi
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

What Converges in the Platonic Representation Hypothesis? Structure over Geometry

The paper investigates the Platonic Representation Hypothesis, which posits that more capable models converge toward shared representations. By distinguishing relational structure (which samples are related) from metric geometry (quantitative relations like distances), the authors develop a controlled $2 imes2$ framework to evaluate both aspects at local and global scales. Their findings show that relational structure consistently converges across vision‑language and video‑text models, while metric geometry converges much more weakly, a pattern that persists even when using a Riemannian metric approximation.

By Junwon You, Mihyun Jang, Sangwoo Mo, Jae-Hun Jung
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 8

Geometric Stability: The Missing Axis of Representations

arXiv:2601. 09173v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Representational similarity analysis and related methods compare the internal geometries of neural networks, but they measure only alignment between spaces, leaving a blind spot -- whether a representation's structure is reliably recoverable, not merely similar.

By Prashant C. Raju
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

Beyond Linear Concepts: Discovering and Aligning Non-Linear Concept Manifolds in Large Language Models

The paper extends mechanistic interpretability of large language models by modeling concepts as low‑dimensional non‑linear manifolds rather than linear subspaces. It introduces a concept‑based alignment (CBA) score to compare these manifolds across layers and models, revealing block structures in intermediate layers, a shift from syntax‑dominated to mixed syntactic‑semantic concepts, and training‑dependent multilingual sharing. The study also shows that alignment patterns differ across model families and training stages, with adjacent stages aligning more closely than distant ones.

By Tido Specht, Elias Benedict Krey, Nils Neukirch, Nils Strodthoff
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

Shared Geometry As A Rosetta Stone: Cross-Modal Alignment Without Paired Data

The paper proposes that independently trained multimodal models often share a common geometric structure, allowing cross‑modal alignment without paired data. Using a Wasserstein Procrustes approach with a coarse geometric initialization, the authors align two disjoint embedding sets by estimating a single orthogonal map, achieving consistent alignment across datasets and modalities. While paired examples can further improve performance, the method already outperforms existing techniques in the few‑pair regime and enables text‑to‑image generation without paired data.

By Dominik Schnaus, Thomas Dag\`es, Daniel Cremers, Xi Wang, Phillip Isola