The paper introduces SEEDS, a preview-guided evidence admission framework that allows search agents to selectively admit retrieved documents into their reasoning process. SEEDS exposes lightweight previews of candidates and lets the agent decide which and how many to fully inspect based on its current reasoning state, enabling arbitrary subset selection rather than fixed or rank-based policies. Experiments on nine knowledge-intensive QA benchmarks show that SEEDS improves search effectiveness and reduces full-evidence consumption compared to traditional retrieval prefixes.
By Jiajin Liu, Chenxi Xu, Dongzhe Fan, Yuanfu Sun, Qiaoyu Tan
Clarify-Then-Search is a benchmark that tests whether large language models can ask clarification questions to improve the usefulness of deep search results. It uses 518 real-world query pairs from Baidu, where each intent query is paired with an underspecified version. The evaluation involves a clarifier asking up to three questions, a user answerer providing only explicit information, and a rewriter generating a new query that is then searched; performance is measured by a weighted nugget-recall score.
By Deqiang Huang, Jingbo Zhou, Xinjiang Lu, Tong Xu, Hua Wu, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2607. 28229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The web is increasingly accessed by AI agents rather than humans.
By Luigi Sigillo, Matteo Silvestri, Francesco Tabaro, Rajat Bhatnagar, Syed Irtaza Mubashar, Matt Jeffryes, Daljit Nijjer, Vittorio Perera, Ola Spjuth, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Melissa Harrison, Fabio Petroni
arXiv:2609.14412v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep research agents answer complex questions through iterative loops of searching, reading, and reasoning. Recent work on reasoning-intensive benchmar...
By Radin Hamidi Rad, Amin Bigdeli, Negar Arabzadeh, Sajad Ebrahimi, Charles L. A. Clarke, Benjamin C. M. Fung, Ebrahim Bagheri
The paper introduces decision checkpoints that log observations and tool actions during inference, enabling the assignment of outcome categories to scientific-search agent responses. Using these checkpoints on 540 AutoResearchBench questions, the authors compare keyword search and read-first strategies, finding that keyword search yields 24.6% accuracy while raw search achieves 17.8%. The checkpoint protocol reveals detailed differences in target exposure, inspection attempts, and evidence-search calls that aggregate accuracy alone obscures.
By Hongmin Li, Wanli Zhao
QREF is a plug‑and‑play system that improves DeepSearch agents by refining search queries to match the current reasoning intent and filtering evidence to keep only what is relevant. The Query Refiner rewrites queries for complementary coverage across each search batch, while the Evidence Filter removes distracting retrieval results. Experiments show that QREF boosts DeepSearch performance on four benchmarks, achieving significant Pass@1 gains and dramatically reducing ineffective query batches without changing the agents’ architectures or retraining their reasoning policies.
By Yujia Chen, Yuhui Wang, Junzhe Wang, Shihan Dou, Di Liang, Yujiong Shen, Yuhao Zhou, Zhiheng Xi, Ming Zhang, Senjie Jin, Jiayi Chen, Dingwei Zhu, Yajie Yang, Yuan Hua, Chenyao Lu, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
arXiv:2606. 12871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search Agents (SAs) typically leverage large language models (LLMs) to support complex information-seeking tasks by autonomously exploring web sources and synthesizing information into comprehensive responses.
By Jingxuan Han, Wei Liu, Mingyang Zhu, Youpeng Wang, Ziwen Wang, Lin Qiu, Xuezhi Cao, Xunliang Cai, Zheren Fu, Licheng Zhang, Zhendong Mao
arXiv:2610.41124v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agentic LLM assistants must repeatedly decide whether to answer from memory or to call a tool such as web search. Unnecessary searches cost latency and...
By Nipun D. Pathirage, Kwan Srijomkwan
arXiv:2608. 02751v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing deep-research agents use a Search--Visit workflow that retrieves whole webpages without considering the structure they expose through titles, headings, sections, and metadata.
By Shuai Wang, Haodong Chen, Yu Yin, Shengyao Zhuang, Bevan Koopman, Guido Zuccon
The study examines how conversational LLM agents—specifically ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek—use Web search, combining real user interactions with controlled API experiments. It finds that agents differ in when they decide to search, how they craft queries, and which domains they favor, and that more frequent searching does not always improve answer quality. While most responses are grounded in search results, some claims are unsupported, raising attribution concerns.
By Mahsa Amani, Seungeon Lee, Abhisek Dash, Asmaa El Fraihi, Yunah Jang, Elisabeth Kirsten, Qinyuan Wu, Krishna P. Gummadi, Manish Gupta, Abhilasha Ravichander, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Soumi Das
arXiv:2605. 12887v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Web-enabled LLM agents are changing how online information influences search outcomes.
By Hengwei Ye, Jiasheng Mao, Zhenhan Guan, Zheng Tian
arXiv:2608. 02751v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing deep-research agents use a search-visit workflow that retrieves and reads whole pages, without considering the addressable structure that web sources expose through titles, headings, sections, and metadata.
By Shuai Wang, Haodong Chen, Yu Yin, Shengyao Zhuang, Bevan Koopman, Guido Zuccon