arXiv AI By Shuai Wang, Haodong Chen, Yu Yin, Shengyao Zhuang, Bevan Koopman, Guido Zuccon

Search, Inspect, Fetch: Exploiting Boolean Retrieval for Deep-Research Agents

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 02751v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing deep-research agents use a search-visit workflow that retrieves and reads whole pages, without considering the addressable structure that web sources expose through titles, headings, sections, and metadata.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Search, Inspect, Fetch: Exploiting Structure-Aware Boolean Retrieval for Deep-Search Agents

The paper introduces Sieve, a search‑inspect‑fetch framework that leverages a Boolean Query Language (BQL) to target specific webpage fields, rank candidates, present structure‑rich result cards, and fetch only selected sections. Compared to traditional Search‑Visit agents, Sieve achieves higher accuracy across three QA collections while reducing token usage by 20.7–50.6%. Boolean filtering consistently improves performance for all tested rankers and remains effective across different retrievers and agent backbones.

By Shuai Wang, Haodong Chen, Yu Yin, Shengyao Zhuang, Bevan Koopman, Guido Zuccon
arXiv AI
Jul 31

SimpleWikiSearch: A Clean Offline Wikipedia Environment for Agentic Search

arXiv:2607. 26070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agentic search systems are often evaluated as if the underlying LLM were the only component that matters, yet their measured performance also depends on the surrounding search environment: the Wikipedia snapshot, preprocessing pipeline, chunking policy, retrieval backend, tool schema, observation format, and answer submission rule.

By Guanming Xiong, Penghui Zhang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 8

Q2D-Web: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Retrieval in Agentic RAG Systems

Q2D-Web is a new large‑scale benchmark for agentic Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, featuring a 190 million‑document web corpus and 70 k machine‑reformulated search queries in ten languages. It supplies three sets of relevance judgments—agent citations, production rankings, and a combined set enriched with LLM‑based labels—to evaluate first‑stage retrievers. Experiments on 13 retrievers show consistent ranking across judgment sets but significant variation across domains, languages, and query types, and demonstrate that a carefully sampled sub‑corpus can approximate full‑corpus evaluation with minimal loss in Recall@1000.