arXiv:2606. 17093v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-based single-shot fringe projection profilometry (FPP) has been studied mostly at close range.
arXiv:2606. 17093v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Learning-based single-shot fringe projection profilometry (FPP) has been studied almost entirely at close range, and the networks used are evaluated only on aggregate error, leaving open whether they recover depth from fringe phase or from object-level shape cues that correlate with depth.
arXiv:2607. 11928v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Single-shot fringe projection profilometry (FPP) networks that regress depth directly can exploit a shape-prior shortcut, recovering depth from object boundaries rather than from fringe phase.
arXiv:2511. 20853v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Training and evaluation of state-of-the-art computer vision algorithms for reliable shallow depth of field (DoF) rendering and defocus deblurring remain constrained by a persistent lack of large-scale, full-frame, high fidelity, real-image datasets.
The paper argues that internal self-consistency checks cannot guarantee the accuracy of photogrammetric reconstructions, a limitation that is structural rather than a tuning issue. It introduces a track‑leakage‑free hold‑out protocol that withholds a deterministic subset of images and tests each against only 3D points supported by at least two retained images, ensuring no view is evaluated against the structure it helped create. Experiments on diverse datasets show that while the protocol is well‑posed, it saturates at a confidence score of 1.00 and fails to detect coherent distortion, missing large errors that can reach over 100 m. whyItMatters":"The study highlights that hold‑out self‑validation scores, increasingly used as quality evidence for metric deliverables, may be misleading and cannot replace external survey validation."
arXiv:2608. 19860v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Single-shot exposure correction aims to map an arbitrarily degraded image---whether under-exposed, over-exposed, or a spatial mixture of both---to a well-exposed output from a single capture.
arXiv:2410.18321v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Confidence calibration matters wherever a classifier's probabilities, not just its labels, are consumed downstream. We study Focal Calibration Loss...
The paper audits the confidence outputs of seven feed‑forward 3D reconstruction backbones across 13 datasets, evaluating four properties: error ranking, average error‑to‑uncertainty ratio, slope of this ratio, and coverage of the implied error distribution. While confidence ranks errors well, the decoded uncertainty is consistently too small—off by at least 2.4× on median cases—and worsens with higher confidence. A post‑hoc power‑law fit per backbone‑dataset pair improves all four metrics at the dataset level, reducing the median error by 1.35×, but fails to correct coverage for many held‑out scenes, indicating the models lack the correct error scale and distribution shape.
arXiv:2608.21008v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mobile AR frameworks attach a metric pose prior to every casual phone capture, and turning it into reconstruction-grade poses cheaply on CPU is the ste...
arXiv:2605. 30581v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Industrial visual sim-to-real is often described as transferring from synthetic images to real images, but industrial deployment usually involves a broader mismatch between available evidence and required decisions.
arXiv:2607. 28695v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Here is the plain text version optimized for arXiv's submission form.
arXiv:2608. 07795v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prediction intervals for multi-modal regression with tabular variables, text, images, or other input sources are difficult to calibrate when those sources disagree or one is missing.
arXiv:2608.29705v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Feed-forward 3D reconstruction models emit a per-pixel confidence that downstream systems read as a reliability signal. It is trained as a loss weigh...