Kolibri is an English‑German mixture‑of‑experts transformer with 78.1 B total parameters and 3.46 B active parameters per token, released under the Apache 2.0 licence. It was trained on 24 T tokens, with German comprising over 20 % of the data, and includes supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning on more than 1.2 M curated tasks. The model activates only 4.4 % of its parameters per token and, among open models evaluated, sits on the Pareto frontier of quality and serving cost for both English and German.
By Aleph Alpha, :, Moritz Althaus, Artur Baranowski, Michael Barlow, Fabien C. Y. Benureau, Felix Berkenkamp, Amrita Bhattacherjee, Lukas Bl\"ubaum, Duncan Blythe, Augustijn de Boer, Bastian Boll, Thomas F. Burns, Bj\"orn Deiseroth, Niko D\"urr, B\'eni Bal\'azs Egressy, Niklas Finken, Niklas Freymuth, Fabian Gebhart, Max Hammer, Bastian Harren, Andreas Hartel, Johann Higl, Steffen Hirschmann, Pablo Iyu Guerrero, Yasser Jadidi, Andreas Jagusch, Mitja Kleider, Markus Klein, Jonas Knupp, Murali Kondragunta, Garwin Lechner, Dominik L\^e-Kellner, Jurek Leonhardt, Jiaze Li, Sohir Maskey, Omar Mehio, Pit Neitemeier, Letitia Parcalabescu, Alejandro Petry Pacheco, Pranav Ragupathy, Martin Reinhardt, Peter Rodenkirch Nfissi, Dylan Rodriquez, Leonard Salewski, Raziye Sari, Jordan Sassoon, Ivo Schaper, Ilhan Scheer, Frank Schneider, Philipp Scholl, Lukas Schott, Eric Schreiber, Pablo Schumacher, Alessio Serra, Philipp Siedler, Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad, Mohamed Soliman, Till Speicher, Volker Stampa, Simon Thel, Serge Thilges, Irina Vidal Migall\'on, Denis Wa{\ss}mann, Samuel Weinbach, Sascha Wirges, Michael W\"uthrich, Alexei Zacharov
The paper evaluates System One decision models—typed models that output probabilities for branching decisions—against supervised classifiers and generative language models on automated decision gate tasks. Eight checkpoints from six families, including the hosted model Jev, were benchmarked on workflow, intent, and social‑science items, showing that small trained classifiers match or slightly outperform decision models on intent and workflow when labels are available, while decision models outperform zero‑shot classifiers when labels are absent. The study also explores calibration, risk thresholds, and cost‑efficiency trade‑offs, providing condition‑dependent design guidelines for automated decision gates.
By Amir Rafe, Subasish Das
arXiv:2610.19331v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: This paper presents LLM-jp-4, a family of Japanese sovereign large language models (LLMs) developed with an emphasis on transparency, reproducibility,...
By LLM-jp, :, Chaoran Liu, Daisuke Kawahara, Hideyuki Tachibana, Hirokazu Kiyomaru, Jun Suzuki, Koshi Eguchi, Kouta Nakayama, Qianying Liu, Rio Yokota, Ryo Takahashi, Sadao Kurohashi, Sosuke Hosokawa, Taishi Nakamura, Takashi Kodama, Yun-Ang Wu, Yusuke Miyao, Yusuke Oda
arXiv:2607. 09424v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Soofi S 30B-A3B, a sovereign, open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) hybrid Mamba Transformer foundation model for German and English.
By The Soofi-Team, :, Benedikt Droste, David Fitzek, Ruben H\"arle, Lukas Helff, Maximilian Idahl, Alex Jude, Abbas Goher Khan, Maurice Kraus, Timm Ruland, Richard Rutmann, Sebastian Sztwiertnia, Markus Frey, Daniil Gurgurov, Jan Pfister, Tom R\"ohr, Sebastian von Rohrscheidt, J\"org Bienert, Nicolas Flores-Herr, Simon Gottschalk, Andreas Hotho, Kristian Kersting, Joachim K\"ohler, Alexander L\"oser, Wolfgang Nejdl, Simon Ostermann, Jan Plogsties, Patrick Putzky, Mehdi Ali, Michael Fromm, Max L\"ubbering
arXiv:2610.17205v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM-based decision-making systems, also called System One models, have recently gained popularity, most notably through Jev (Almeida, 2026). Given a ty...
By Jonathan Geuter, Andrew Cheng, David Alvarez-Melis
arXiv:2606. 03650v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Choosing or ranking language models for a specific application is hardest when no task-specific labeled data exists, and standard public benchmarks cannot be trusted, their items having likely leaked into pretraining, so scores reflect memorization rather than fitness.
By Alexander Apartsin, Yehudit Aperstein
System1-Arena is a benchmark that evaluates which decisions can be handled by System‑1 models—those that output probabilities in a single forward pass—versus System‑2 models that generate reasoning steps. It contains 92,000 questions across 105 tasks from 268 public sources, grouped into text classification, applied decisions, evaluation and control, and agent/action, and also includes 138 closed‑loop environments such as web shopping, coding control, robotics, games, and driving. The study tests 30 models, showing that large System‑1 models can match or exceed fast closed LLMs in non‑agentic accuracy with better‑calibrated probabilities at lower latency, while reasoning LLMs are most accurate but far more expensive, and large open LLMs perform best in closed‑loop settings.
By Tianyu Chen, Xinyang Liu, Ruyi An, Zhendong Wang, Mingyuan Zhou
The paper introduces Chinese Decision, a family of Chinese-language models designed for single-pass probabilistic decision-making. The models generate logits for candidate choices in one forward pass and normalize them without autoregressive generation, supporting Boolean, categorical, and ordinal decisions. A 0.8B model trained on 13.048 million decisions achieves 72.24% general-domain accuracy and 76.98% average accuracy across medicine, law, and finance, while a 2B model shows comparable performance after partial training.
By Qiang Yan (Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
arXiv:2607. 01829v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed for aviation business operations, from documentation and training generation to customer facing assistants.
By Alex Brooker, Tim Hughes
The paper introduces a small candidate formalizer that bridges the gap between open-ended tasks handled by large language models and fast decision models that require a predefined candidate list. By generating explicit, validated alternatives from task context, the formalizer allows a frozen decision model to select an entry efficiently. Experiments on CALVIN-D show that using the formalizer improves success rates from 11.8% to 52.6% and reduces latency to 2.09 s compared to 3.67 s with a larger language model.
By Chengxuan Pei, Ziyao Wang, Teng Mei, Zhe Li
The paper introduces System 1 models—fast, single‑pass decision engines that map inputs directly to structured outputs, addressing the latency, cost, and calibration issues of large language models. It presents a five‑family taxonomy (encoder‑based classifiers, reward models, non‑autoregressive engines, contrastive models, and extraction models) and discusses training, deployment trade‑offs, and calibration theory, including proper scoring rules and RLCD. The guide also covers integration into agentic workflows, System 1+System 2 cascades, 18 application domains, an open‑source ecosystem, and practical resources such as code, a model zoo, and assessment questions.
By Haggai Roitman
The paper introduces Jev, a specialized decision model that selects among given options rather than generating text, and benchmarks it against 19 large language models (LLMs) across 13 multiple-choice tasks in knowledge, reasoning, and multilingual domains. Jev performs competitively with frontier LLMs on knowledge and commonsense benchmarks, achieving the top score on MMLU-Redux and ARC-Challenge, and surpasses most representative and all small LLMs except in mathematical word problems where it lags behind. The study demonstrates that a specialized decision model can match general-purpose LLMs on knowledge-based decisions but struggles with multi-step calculations.
By Xing Li, Qingcheng Chang, Jinzhong Ning, Changfeng Xu, Shenlong Zhang, Yijia Zhang, Ling Luo, Hongfei Lin