arXiv AI

Kolibri: A Sovereign European Model on the Pareto Frontier

Kolibri is an English‑German mixture‑of‑experts transformer with 78.1 B total parameters and 3.46 B active parameters per token, released under the Apache 2.0 licence. It was trained on 24 T tokens, with German comprising over 20 % of the data, and includes supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning on more than 1.2 M curated tasks. The model activates only 4.4 % of its parameters per token and, among open models evaluated, sits on the Pareto frontier of quality and serving cost for both English and German.

arXiv AI
Jul 13

A Sovereign, Open-Source Foundation Model for German and English

arXiv:2607. 09424v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Soofi S 30B-A3B, a sovereign, open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) hybrid Mamba Transformer foundation model for German and English.

By The Soofi-Team, :, Benedikt Droste, David Fitzek, Ruben H\"arle, Lukas Helff, Maximilian Idahl, Alex Jude, Abbas Goher Khan, Maurice Kraus, Timm Ruland, Richard Rutmann, Sebastian Sztwiertnia, Markus Frey, Daniil Gurgurov, Jan Pfister, Tom R\"ohr, Sebastian von Rohrscheidt, J\"org Bienert, Nicolas Flores-Herr, Simon Gottschalk, Andreas Hotho, Kristian Kersting, Joachim K\"ohler, Alexander L\"oser, Wolfgang Nejdl, Simon Ostermann, Jan Plogsties, Patrick Putzky, Mehdi Ali, Michael Fromm, Max L\"ubbering
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30

It's All Training: A Fully Synthetic Single-Stage Recipe for LLMs

arXiv:2609.37891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current pre-training datasets are derived from web crawls, with all their issues, and were not designed to support mid- and post-training pipelines--...

By Pierre-Carl Langlais, Pieter Delobelle, Yannick Detrois, Pavel Chizhov, Carlos Rosas-Hinostroza, Neil Si Smail, Benjamin Burtin, Hanna Shcharbakova, Ivan Yamshchikov, Anastasia Stasenko
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 23

Mimir: A Sub-2B Hierarchical Reasoning Model Trained on Permissible Data Punches Above Its Weight Class

Mimir is a 1.78‑B parameter language model built on the Hierarchical Reasoning Model Text (HRM‑Text) architecture, which interleaves low‑level and high‑level transformer stacks. It is trained from scratch on a curated mix of 161 instruction, reasoning, tool‑use, multilingual, and synthetic datasets totaling 70.5 B tokens per epoch (103 B for the continued‑training version Mimir v1.5), using only data that meets permissibility criteria. Across 20 benchmarks in English, Danish, and Math & Code, Mimir v1.5 outperforms all other sub‑2 B models and matches or exceeds the performance of larger 9 B‑parameter models, while memorisation audits show low risk and inference‑time ablations reveal graceful degradation when adjusting low‑level stack applications.

By Peter Schneider-Kamp, Jacob Nielsen, Gianluca Barmina, Danial Namazifard, Annemette Brok Pirchert, Kenneth Enevoldsen, Lukas Galke Poech
arXiv AI
Jun 26

NebulaExp-8B: An Empirical Post-Training Pipeline via Full-Scale Ablation Research

arXiv:2606. 26671v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training alignment determines the reasoning and human preference following capabilities of large language models, yet most existing works withhold detailed data construction, filtering rules and training recipes, which hinders community reproducibility and lightweight model optimization.

By Qiaobo Hao, Yangqian Wu, Shunyi Wang, Zhongjian Zhang, Ziqun Li, Yayin He, Muqing Li, Chen Zhong
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 21

RAGAL: A Frugal, Fully Local Retrieval-Augmented Assistant for Technical Support at a Government Agency

Public institutions hold large volumes of sensitive documents and support tickets that cannot leave the premises, ruling out cloud-hosted language models entirely. We report on RAGAL, a retrieval-augmented assistant for the technical-support team of AFIR, the Romanian Agency for Financing Rural Investments, built and operated under three hard constraints: zero data egress (no external API calls, even for synthetic data), a read-only mandate (the assistant drafts, humans execute), and a single 8 GB consumer laptop as the only development and training machine.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 24

Index SLM Technical Report

arXiv:2607.09885v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present Index-1.9B, a series of open small language models developed at Bilibili. The series comprises four models: Index-1.9B-Base, a foundatio...

By Tianjiao Li, Lusheng Zhang, Shien He, Xiaojing Liu, Tianxing Yan, Mengran Yu, Ziang Cui, Kai Zhao, Xipeng Wang, Yang Liu, Yuxin Li
arXiv AI
Aug 13

VAKRA: Evaluating Multi-Hop Reasoning Across APIs and Retrieval Under Tool-Use Policies

arXiv:2608. 12282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agents deployed in enterprise settings must reason across structured APIs and document collections, yet existing benchmarks evaluate these capabilities in isolation.

By Ankita Rajaram Naik, Anupama Murthi, Benjamin Elder, Siyu Huo, Raavi Gupta, Abhinav Jain, Praveen Venkateswaran, Abdulhamid Adebayo, Danish Contractor
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 14

Parameter-Efficient Retrievers for Polish and European Languages

The paper introduces a three‑stage training pipeline that builds compact, efficient dense retrievers without requiring ground‑truth relevance labels. Using cross‑lingual alignment, relational knowledge distillation, and contrastive fine‑tuning, the authors develop PolDense (six Polish models ranging from 17 M to 1 B parameters) and EuroDense (a 435 M‑parameter model covering nine European languages). Extensive evaluation on 41 Polish and 150 multilingual tasks shows that PolDense‑1B outperforms larger retrievers up to 9 B parameters, while EuroDense leads in task‑averaged and language‑averaged performance among models below 1 B parameters.

By S{\l}awomir Dadas, Rafa{\l} Po\'swiata, Ma{\l}gorzata Gr\k{e}bowiec, Micha{\l} Pere{\l}kiewicz
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16

Data Strategies for Large Language Models: A Unified Perspective on the Training Lifecycle

The paper reviews data strategies for large language models, emphasizing that data strategy—selecting, weighting, and scheduling training data—determines model capabilities within a fixed data budget. It treats high‑quality data as having training‑dependent utility, varying with the target objective, model, and training state. The authors organize existing methods by decision granularity, model dependence, and temporal adaptivity, comparing their computational costs and empirical support, and note limited evidence for transfer across model scales and end‑to‑end cost parity.

By Yuanjian Xu, Jianing Hao, Tianze Sun, Yongyao Duan, Sam Chen, Jinyi Han, Wanbo Zhang, Yuxuan Sun, Guang Zhang, Zhong Li