Real-Time Driver Safety Scoring Through Inverse Crash Probability Modeling
arXiv:2603. 14841v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Road crashes remain a leading cause of preventable fatalities.
arXiv:2607. 01365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Given one or more images of a railway crossing, can we leverage visual cues that allow us to robustly estimate how safe it is?
arXiv:2603. 14841v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Road crashes remain a leading cause of preventable fatalities.
PRISM (Proactive Risk Intelligence and Safety Management) is an agentic multi-model architecture designed to shift autonomous transportation safety from reactive crash avoidance to proactive, continuous risk management. It uses inverse crash‑probability modeling to transform binary crash classifiers into dynamic safety scores, and runs three specialized models—trajectory kinematics, environmental risk, and VRU interaction—coordinated by a reinforcement‑learning reasoning layer. Across 1,296 naturalistic driving scenarios, PRISM achieved a mean safety score of 68/100, classified 77.6% of situations as advisory, and flagged 3.8% as near‑misses, with 11% requiring intervention or emergency response, highlighting trajectory risk and VRU proximity as key safety factors.
arXiv:2606. 12500v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traffic microsimulation combined with surrogate safety measures has increasingly been used as a proactive alternative to historical crash data for predicting crash frequency for current or planned road infrastructure designs.
EG-ARSA introduces an Expert‑Grounded Distillation (EGD) framework that transfers institutional road safety expertise into a compact vision‑language model for visual road safety auditing. The method calibrates a teacher model against authoritative field audits, achieving a Cohen’s kappa of 0.74 before generating structured supervision for an 8‑billion‑parameter student model via Low‑Rank Adaptation. The authors also release Bangladesh Road Safety Audit (BD‑ARSA), an open dataset of 21,947 image‑audit records, and demonstrate that the student model outperforms both its larger teacher and Gemini‑2.5‑Flash in ordinal risk assessment and expert evaluation.
arXiv:2608. 09230v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial-safety understanding requires more than detecting workers, equipment, and personal protective equipment.
arXiv:2511.20022v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advancements in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong understanding of driving scenes, drawing interest in their...
arXiv:2609.15997v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Improving safety at intersections requires identifying crash mechanisms and recommending appropriate countermeasures. However, this process tradition...
arXiv:2410. 08491v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated vehicles (AVs) promise to enhance transportation safety and efficiency.
arXiv:2607. 07103v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe autonomous driving requires both rapid responses to common high-risk events and deeper reasoning over rare, extreme long-tail scenarios in traffic safety.
arXiv:2608. 14746v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The aviation industry characterized by its stringent safety standards has seen a growing need for innovative approaches to enhance safety measures.
Safe autonomous driving requires both rapid responses to common high-risk events and deeper reasoning over rare, extreme long-tail scenarios in traffic safety. These scenarios are severely under-represented in naturalistic driving data, and existing trajectory and language-augmented datasets seldom provide high-risk event labels, semantic annotations, and verifiable safety signals.
arXiv:2607. 17575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose ARBITER, a novel LLM guardrail framework that introduces two key ideas: (i) dual-hypothesis reasoning, a reasoning method for LLM guardrails that explicitly considers both safe and unsafe interpretations of a prompt before making a safety decision, and (ii) multi-component supervised fine-tuning (MC-SFT), a structured training loss for reasoning-based guardrails that decomposes LLM outputs into logical components and weights them according to their importance.