arXiv:2407. 21311v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to mitigate domain shift, where the distribution of labeled source data differs from that of unlabeled target data.
By Ali Abedi, Q. M. Jonathan Wu, Ning Zhang, Farhad Pourpanah
Correlation alignment and the maximum mean discrepancy are two widely used distribution-matching frameworks for unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA). However, high variance in these losses has been shown to undermine their effectiveness in minibatch optimisation settings.
arXiv:2607. 20367v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Correlation alignment and the maximum mean discrepancy are two widely used distribution-matching frameworks for unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA).
By Andrea Napoli
arXiv:2606. 00558v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transfer learning aims to facilitate the learning of a target domain by transferring knowledge from a source domain.
By Yuan Yao, Jin Song, Huixia Li, Tongtong Yuan, Jiaqi Wu, Yu Zhang
This paper introduces a method for adapting unlabeled‑unlabeled (UU) learning to distribution shifts by applying importance weighting. The approach estimates weights from UU data in both training and test distributions to minimize test risk, enabling handling of various learning scenarios—including PU and noisy‑label learning—without assuming specific shift types. Experiments on real‑world datasets confirm the method’s effectiveness.
By Atsutoshi Kumagai, Tomoharu Iwata, Hiroshi Takahashi, Taishi Nishiyama, Kazuki Adachi, Yasuhiro Fujiwara
arXiv:2607. 17653v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Source-free universal domain adaptation (SF-UniDA) adapts a pre-trained source model to an unlabeled target domain under both covariate and label shifts, without access to source data.
By Jing Li, Pan Liu, Meng Zhao, Wanli Xue, Yanhong Yang, Xu Cheng, Fan Shi, Jianhua Zhang, Qinghua Hu, Shengyong Chen
arXiv:2608. 09193v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Unsupervised time-series domain adaptation (DA) addresses the challenge of transferring a classifier from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain under distribution shifts induced by different users, sensors, devices, acquisition conditions, or temporal dynamics.
By Felix Ott, Christopher Mutschler
arXiv:2609.23248v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A fundamental challenge in deploying vision models is domain shift, which arises when training and test data follow different distributions, leading to...
By Jo\~ao Renato Ribeiro Manesco, Danilo Samuel Jodas, Douglas Rodrigues, Leandro Aparecido Passos, Jo\~ao Paulo Papa
arXiv:2610.01890v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Deep generative networks have recently achieved unprecedented performance in precise image and video editing using sophisticated textual prompts. How...
By Victor Enescu, Assaad Zeghina, Matthieu Meignin, Nicolas Viltard, C\'ecile Mallet
With growing privacy and portability concerns, source-free domain adaptation requires only a source pre-trained model and an unlabeled target domain, allowing for effective adaptation to the target data. Most existing self-training methods focus on selecting and exploiting samples with reliable predictions, often neglecting others.
arXiv:2311. 07461v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous systems (AS) often rely on Deep Neural Network (DNN) classifiers to operate in complex and dynamically changing environments.
By Abanoub Ghobrial, Kerstin Eder
Numerous unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) algori-thms exist, but for clinical practice, selecting the best-suited one along with proper hyperparameters often remains unclear, as the unlabeled deployment (target) domain prevents direct evaluation. We propose a label-free criterion that jointly selects the algorithm and hyperparameters for UDA.