arXiv Computer Vision

V-JEPA 2 Meets AQA: Phase-Based Scoring and Reference-Based Feedback for Mountain Biking

The paper presents a system for assessing mountain‑bike jump quality using weak binary labels and candidate feedback. It processes 95 field‑recorded jump clips with frozen V‑JEPA 2 video features, pose and motion measurements, and a transformer to predict a binary score. The model achieves an AUROC of 0.768 and average precision of 0.812 in cross‑validation, but the results highlight limitations in rider‑independent scoring and reliable feedback.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

Orthogonal Ensembles and Tested Explanations for Performer-Independent Body-Motion Emotion Recognition

The paper investigates 12‑class body‑only emotion recognition from skeleton motion using a leave‑performer‑out evaluation, where chance accuracy is 8.3% and a reproduced STGCN++ baseline scores 25.73% Macro‑F1. By ensembling eleven models with orthogonal error modes, the authors achieve 36.80% Macro‑F1, a 43% relative improvement over the baseline. They also introduce a tested explanation suite that demonstrates the ensemble’s decisions rely on motion‑grounded body‑region evidence, aligning strongly with Laban Movement Analysis attributes rather than classical kinematics, while showing diffuse temporal saliency.

By Naoto Nishida, Yoshio Ishiguro
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 25

Training-Free Hold-Usage Detection in Sport Climbing with Foundation Pose Models

The paper presents a training‑free method for detecting which holds a climber uses in sport climbing videos by leveraging a frozen foundation pose model (Sapiens) that provides fingertip and toe keypoints. Using a simple proximity test, mutual exclusion, and a temporal‑persistence rule, the approach achieves high F_1 scores (up to 90.2%) on the Way Up dataset without any climbing‑specific training, outperforming repurposed pose pipelines. The resulting automatic predictions enable accurate coaching statistics, such as climb time and pace, with Pearson correlations of 1.00 and 0.94 respectively.

By Abu Bakar, Abdullah Aftab, Amir Hamza
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Can Vision-Language Models Judge Olympic Diving? From Reasoning to Scores in Zero-Shot Action Quality Assessment

The paper investigates whether open‑source Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) can perform zero‑shot action quality assessment (AQA) on Olympic diving videos. Using the AQA‑7 benchmark, the authors propose a regression framework that combines VLM‑generated semantic reasoning, phase‑level sub‑scores, TF‑IDF vectorization, dimensionality reduction, and ensemble learning to predict final competition scores. While individual VLMs achieve moderate Spearman correlations (<0.32), the ensemble approach boosts performance to 0.67, demonstrating that VLM‑derived textual reasoning features are more informative than raw numerical sub‑scores for AQA. whyItMatters":"The study shows that VLMs can serve as explainable, semi‑automated tools for evaluating sports performance, potentially aiding expert judging in complex, subjective Olympic events."

By Henry O. Velesaca, David Freire-Obregon, Luigi Miranda, Abel Reyes-Angulo
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Aggregate, Don't Adapt: Subject-Level Posterior Aggregation and Transductive Calibration for Cross-Site Parkinsonian Gait Severity

The paper reports the winning solution to the MoCha 2026 Parkinsonian Gait Benchmark, achieving a macro‑F1 score of 0.6945 on unseen clinical sites. The approach relies on a frozen public motion encoder followed by a single 4×512 linear layer, and gains are largely attributed to three key steps: exact replication of the benchmark’s head recipe, averaging per‑walk posteriors at the subject level, and a label‑free transductive calibration of feature means and decision thresholds. Extensive ablation studies show that fine‑tuning the encoder or using alternative encoders does not improve performance, and the subject‑level aggregation is identified as the primary contributor to the top score.

By Junlong Shen
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 28

Readout and Operating-Point Sensitivity in Event-Stream Candidate Selection

The paper evaluates how readout settings and operating points affect event-stream candidate selection in event-triggered recording. Using 520 DailyDVS‑200 clips and 47 participants, the authors compare several encoder configurations—including DINO‑CLS, patch mean, and MobileNetV3‑Small—across different accumulation durations and view counts, reporting metrics such as target capture, false triggers, and partial AUC. The study finds that lightweight baselines and specific operating points significantly influence performance, while no clear advantage is observed for the JEPA‑specific method.

By Yifan Shuai